Bill · H.Res. 1497· House(119-HRES-1497)
Commemorating the 13 United States servicemembers killed at Abbey Gate during and as a result of President Biden's disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal.
- Introduced
- 8/27/2026
- Last activity
- 8/27/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Matt Van Epps
- Cosponsors
- - 41 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 1497 is a resolution to commemorate the 13 United States servicemembers killed at Abbey Gate during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. The resolution condemns the Biden-Harris administration for what it describes as a disastrous and chaotic withdrawal. It cites failures in planning, the abandonment of Bagram Air Base, and the lack of accountability for officials. The text lists the names of the 13 fallen servicemembers to provide them with lasting recognition. Ultimately, the House of Representatives resolves to commemorate the anniversary of the bombing and denounce the administration's handling of the event.
Yes
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+5
The bill provides lasting recognition and honors the sacrifice of 13 fallen servicemembers.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3
The resolution calls for accountability for officials regarding the withdrawal process.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?-7
The bill claims the withdrawal abandoned allies and NATO partners.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?-5
The resolution denounces the administration's diplomatic failures and abandonment of allies.
Does this tighten control of the border?-5
The bill criticizes the failure of vetting processes and the entry of unvetted individuals.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Recognition of Servicemembers: The resolution provides lasting recognition for the 13 servicemembers killed at Abbey Gate by explicitly listing their names and ranks, which honors their sacrifice.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
National Security Risks: The text states that the withdrawal handed terrorists a safe haven and $7,000,000,000 in American-funded weapons and equipment, as well as the loss of a U.S. presence which crippled the ability to monitor threats to the homeland.
-
Vetting Failures: An FBI audit and DHS report cited in the text indicate that the need for immediate evacuation overtook normal security processes, leading to "inaccurate, incomplete, or missing" vetting data for individuals entering the United States.
-
Risks to Children: The text mentions that Afghan men were admitted with young girls alleged to be victims of forced marriage, and because the U.S. lacked criminal records, there was no way to know if these men were predators.
-
Abandonment of Allies: The resolution notes that Americans and allies were stranded behind enemy lines and that the Taliban carried out reprisal killings of Afghans who served with the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances-7Improves Diplomatic Engagement-5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security-5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+5Good For Immigrants-5Good For Children-4
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+3
- 9/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/27/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 33 Cosponsors added.
Mark AlfordRepublican · Missouri
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Tim BurchettRepublican · Tennessee
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Clay FullerRepublican · Georgia
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Darrell IssaRepublican · California
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Young KimRepublican · California
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Daniel WebsterRepublican · Florida
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas