Lauren Boebert
Republican · Representative for Colorado's 4th district
22 sponsored · 272 cosponsored
In the House since 2021
Age 40
Contact their office: (202) 225-4761 · 1713 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 · Official website
In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)
- Sponsored 22 bills.The typical House member sponsored 25. Bills they wrote, not ones they signed on to.
- 2 bills they backed became law.They cosponsored them.
- 19 passed the House and wait on the Senate.And 1 has passed both chambers and gone to the President.
- Missed 30 of 676 recorded votes (4.4%).The typical House member missed 1.9%. The record doesn’t say why.
- Works most on government operations and politics and crime and law enforcement.38 and 37 of the 294 bills they wrote or backed.
What they got done
Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.
Became law (2)
This bill extends the legislative authority of the National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Foundation. This foundation wants to establish a commemorative work in the District of Columbia and its environs.
Became law · 119-HR-2196
This bill aims to amend title 38 of the United States Code. The primary purpose is to increase the rate of the special pension paid to Medal of Honor recipients.
Became law · 119-HR-695
- Yes: Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?The bill increases the monthly special pension rate for Medal of Honor recipients by linking it to veteran compensation rates. +7
Passed Congress — the President's turn (1)
Both chambers passed it. The President signs it into law or vetoes it, and a veto stands unless two-thirds of each chamber vote to pass it anyway. Everything Congress has sent the President →
This bill makes changes to how the Arkansas Valley Conduit in Colorado is repaid. The bill sets up a repayment contract for the conduit to supply domestic water to communities and households that lack reliable access.
The House fell short of the two-thirds needed to override the veto 248–177 · 119-HR-131
- Yes: Would people in rural areas be better off under this?The bill secures domestic water supplies for communities and households lacking reliable access in the Colorado region. +5
Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (19)
Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.
This Act requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a specific final rule regarding the gray wolf.
Passed the House 211–204 · 119-HR-845
- Yes: Would farmers be better off under this?Removing wolf protections may reduce conflicts and risks to livestock. +5
- No: Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?The bill removes the gray wolf from the endangered species list, reducing federal protections for the species. -7
- Their billTo direct the United States Postal Service to designate single, unique ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for other purposes.Jul 21, 2025
This Act directs the United States Postal Service to take specific action regarding ZIP Code designations.
Passed the House 278–121 · 119-HR-3095
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
Passed the House 417–3 · 119-HR-9340
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
And 16 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.
Still waiting, of the 22 bills they wrote: 1 cleared committee and waits for a first vote, 18 are in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.
What their bills would do
Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().
Who their bills would affect
What else they would change
How they voted lately
Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The main purpose is to provide a clear definition of adequate consideration for certain closely held stock.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would retired people be better off under this?Improving the clarity of stock valuation for ESOPs supports more stable retirement transitions. +4
119-S-2403 · roll call 314
This Act provides for improvements to rivers and harbors in the United States and the conservation and development of water and related resources.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?Directly authorizes land transfers to Tribal entities and prioritizes technical assistance for Tribal communities. +8
- No: Does this reduce what the federal government spends?The bill explicitly increases spending limits and funding authorizations for dozens of regional water resource programs. -5
119-HR-9497 · roll call 313
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
119-HR-9340 · roll call 312
On the President’s vetoes
The President can refuse to sign a bill both chambers passed. It becomes law anyway only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to pass it again. A vote against the veto (a Yea) was a vote to make the bill law over the President’s objection; a vote for it (a Nay) was a vote to let the veto stand.
Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
Against the vetovoted Yea, to make the bill law anyway.
The override fell short in the House, 248–177; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
Against the vetovoted Yea, to make the bill law anyway.
The override fell short in the House, 236–188; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
How busy they have been
How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.