Russell Fry
Republican · Representative for South Carolina's 7th district
20 sponsored · 202 cosponsored
In the House since 2023
Age 41
Contact their office: (202) 225-9895 · 345 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 · Official website
In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)
- Sponsored 20 bills.The typical House member sponsored 25. Bills they wrote, not ones they signed on to.
- 2 bills they backed became law.1 they wrote, 1 they cosponsored.
- 25 passed the House and wait on the Senate.The Senate has to pass the same text before it can become law.
- Missed 4 of 676 recorded votes (0.6%).The typical House member missed 1.9%. The record doesn’t say why.
- Works most on crime and law enforcement and immigration.45 and 21 of the 222 bills they wrote or backed.
What they got done
Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.
Became law (2)
This bill aims to provide relief for individuals who committed crimes as a direct result of being victims of human trafficking.
Became law · 119-HR-4323
- Yes: Does this shorten or soften prison sentences?The bill allows for vacating convictions, expunging arrests, and reducing sentences for victims of trafficking. +8
This Act authorizes the award of 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. The medals recognize the team's victory over the Soviet Union during the 1980 Winter Olympics.
Became law · 119-HR-452
Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (25)
Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.
This Act seeks to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. It specifically focuses on revising the legal definition of a showerhead.
Passed the House 226–197 · 119-HR-4593
This bill aims to enhance efforts to combat the trafficking of children by amending existing laws.
Passed the House 225–201 · 119-HR-4371
- Yes: Would children be better off under this?The bill mandates stricter background checks and vetting to protect children from traffickers, smugglers, and dangerous household members. +4
- No: Would immigrants be better off under this?The bill restricts potential sponsors to only U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents and mandates secure placement for certain children. -3
This act creates a program for federal law enforcement officers. The Administrator of General Services is required to establish a program within one year of enactment.
Passed the House 234–182 · 119-HR-2255
- Yes: Would gun owners be better off under this?The bill creates a mechanism for federal law enforcement officers to purchase firearms at a discounted salvage value. +5
And 22 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.
Still waiting, of the 20 bills they wrote: 2 cleared committee and wait for a first vote, 14 are in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.
What their bills would do
Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().
Who their bills would affect
What else they would change
How they voted lately
Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The main purpose is to provide a clear definition of adequate consideration for certain closely held stock.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would retired people be better off under this?Improving the clarity of stock valuation for ESOPs supports more stable retirement transitions. +4
119-S-2403 · roll call 314
This Act provides for improvements to rivers and harbors in the United States and the conservation and development of water and related resources.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?Directly authorizes land transfers to Tribal entities and prioritizes technical assistance for Tribal communities. +8
- No: Does this reduce what the federal government spends?The bill explicitly increases spending limits and funding authorizations for dozens of regional water resource programs. -5
119-HR-9497 · roll call 313
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
119-HR-9340 · roll call 312
On the President’s vetoes
The President can refuse to sign a bill both chambers passed. It becomes law anyway only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to pass it again. A vote against the veto (a Yea) was a vote to make the bill law over the President’s objection; a vote for it (a Nay) was a vote to let the veto stand.
Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 248–177; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 236–188; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
How busy they have been
How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.