Bill · H.R. 4323· House(119-HR-4323)
Trafficking Survivors Relief Act
- Introduced
- 7/10/2025
- Last activity
- 1/23/2026 — Became Public Law No: 119-73.
- Sponsored by
- Russell Fry
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 8
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
What this bill would do
The Trafficking Survivors Relief Act aims to provide relief for individuals who committed crimes as a direct result of being victims of human trafficking. It establishes a process to vacate convictions for level A offenses and expunge arrests for both level A and level B offenses. The bill allows courts to reduce prison terms for covered prisoners under specific conditions. It also introduces a human trafficking defense of duress for federal prosecutions. Additionally, the act mandates several reports to track the impact of these changes and the training of federal attorneys.
Yes
Does this shorten or soften prison sentences?+8
The bill allows for vacating convictions, expunging arrests, and reducing sentences for victims of trafficking.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+7
The bill provides mechanisms for individuals to challenge convictions and expunge records based on trafficking victimization.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+5
The bill includes provisions to file motions under seal to protect the identities of trafficking survivors.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Vacating Criminal Convictions: Victims of trafficking may have their level A offense convictions vacated, which restores their status to what it was before the arrest (Section 2(b)(1)(A) and 2(c)(3)).
-
Expunging Arrest Records: Individuals may be able to have arrest records removed from official records for level A offenses or certain level B offenses if the conduct was directly related to being a victim of trafficking (Section 2(b)(1)(B) and 2(b)(1)(C)).
-
Sentence Reductions: Courts have the authority to reduce the term of imprisonment for covered prisoners if the crime was a direct result of being a victim of trafficking (Section 2(e)(1)).
-
Legal Protections via Duress Defense: Defendants can establish a defense of duress in federal prosecutions by demonstrating they were a victim of trafficking at the time of the offense (Section 6(b)).
-
Privacy Protections: To protect identities, motions and related documents are filed under seal, and officials are prohibited from making out information available for public inspection (Section 2(h)).
-
Financial Accessibility: There are no filing fees or service charges required to file a motion under this act (Section 2(g)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Limitations on Relief: While convictions can be vacated or arrests expunged, the law does not require courts to amend or remove any existing fine or restitution orders (Section 2(c)(2)).
-
Legal Barriers for Level B Offenses: For level B offenses, relief through expungement is limited to those who were acquitted, had charges dismissed, or had charges reduced to a level A offense (Section 2(b)(1)(C)).
-
Exclusion of Specific Violent Crimes: The definition of a level B offense specifically excludes violent crimes where a child was a victim, which limits the scope of the offense types covered (Section 2(a)(2)(B)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+7Improves Privacy Rights+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Criminal Sentencing Reform+8
- Public Law(1/24/2026)
The text as it became law
- Enrolled Bill
The final version, on its way to the President
Arrived from the other chamber; nothing has been done to it there yet
- 1/23/2026
- Signed by President.
- Became Public Law No: 119-73.
- 1/12/2026
- Presented to President.
- 12/19/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- 12/18/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8894)
- 12/2/2025
- Received in the Senate, read twice.
- 12/1/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4919-4921)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4919-4921)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4323.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4919-4923)
- Mr. Fry moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- 10/17/2025
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-347.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 299.
- 9/10/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/12/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/8/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/29/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/10/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Kevin KileyIndependent · California
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
John RutherfordRepublican · Florida
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri