Darrell Issa
Republican · Representative for California's 48th district
54 sponsored · 129 cosponsored
In the House since 2001
Age 73
Contact their office: (202) 225-5672 · 2108 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 · Official website
In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)
- Sponsored 54 bills.The typical House member sponsored 25. Bills they wrote, not ones they signed on to.
- 1 bill they backed became law.They cosponsored it.
- 23 passed the House and wait on the Senate.The Senate has to pass the same text before it can become law.
- Missed 7 of 676 recorded votes (1%).The typical House member missed 1.9%. The record doesn’t say why.
- Works most on government operations and politics and armed forces and national security.23 and 22 of the 183 bills they wrote or backed.
What they got done
Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.
Became law (1)
This Act authorizes the award of 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. The medals recognize the team's victory over the Soviet Union during the 1980 Winter Olympics.
Became law · 119-HR-452
Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (23)
Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.
- Their billTo take certain land in the State of California into trust for the benefit of the Pechanga Band of Indians, and for other purposes.Jun 2, 2026
This bill takes about 860 acres of land in Riverside County, California, and places it into trust for the benefit of the Pechanga Band of Indians.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-5682
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?The bill directly benefits the Pechanga Band of Indians by expanding their reservation land base through a trust transfer. +8
This Act seeks to amend title 28 of the United States Code. It aims to limit the authority of United States district courts to issue injunctive relief.
Passed the House 219–213 · 119-HR-1526
- No: Does this give the federal government more power?The bill limits the authority of federal district courts to issue broad injunctions, potentially centralizing certain injunctive powers in specific three-judge panels. -3
This joint resolution states that Congress disapproves of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Passed the House 216–211 · 119-HJRES-210
- Yes: Would business owners be better off under this?Removing pollution standards may reduce compliance costs for vessel operators. +3
- No: Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?The bill removes an EPA rule specifically designed to control nonroad engine pollution. -6
And 20 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.
Resolutions of theirs that were adopted (1)
A resolution is a chamber speaking for itself — a position, a rule or a tribute. Adopting it puts it into effect, but it is not a law.
Still waiting, of the 54 bills they wrote: 1 cleared committee and waits for a first vote, 50 are in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.
What their bills would do
Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().
Who their bills would affect
What else they would change
How they voted lately
Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The main purpose is to provide a clear definition of adequate consideration for certain closely held stock.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would retired people be better off under this?Improving the clarity of stock valuation for ESOPs supports more stable retirement transitions. +4
119-S-2403 · roll call 314
This Act provides for improvements to rivers and harbors in the United States and the conservation and development of water and related resources.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?Directly authorizes land transfers to Tribal entities and prioritizes technical assistance for Tribal communities. +8
- No: Does this reduce what the federal government spends?The bill explicitly increases spending limits and funding authorizations for dozens of regional water resource programs. -5
119-HR-9497 · roll call 313
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
119-HR-9340 · roll call 312
On the President’s vetoes
The President can refuse to sign a bill both chambers passed. It becomes law anyway only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to pass it again. A vote against the veto (a Yea) was a vote to make the bill law over the President’s objection; a vote for it (a Nay) was a vote to let the veto stand.
Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 248–177; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 236–188; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
How busy they have been
How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.