Anna Paulina Luna
Republican · Representative for Florida's 13th district
41 sponsored · 328 cosponsored
In the House since 2023
Age 37
Contact their office: (202) 225-5961 · 226 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 · Official website
In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)
- Sponsored 41 bills.The typical House member sponsored 25. Bills they wrote, not ones they signed on to.
- 2 bills they backed became law.They cosponsored them.
- 27 passed the House and wait on the Senate.The Senate has to pass the same text before it can become law.
- Missed 71 of 676 recorded votes (10.5%).The typical House member missed 1.9%. The record doesn’t say why.
- Works most on crime and law enforcement and international affairs.50 and 38 of the 369 bills they wrote or backed.
What they got done
Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.
Became law (2)
This joint resolution addresses a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management. The rule involves Public Land Order No. 7917 regarding the withdrawal of federal lands.
Became law · 119-HJRES-140
- Yes: Does this invest in rural communities?By stopping the land withdrawal in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, the bill keeps federal lands available for local development and use. +3
- No: Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?The resolution reverses a land withdrawal, which prevents the federal government from restricting certain uses of those lands for environmental preservation. -5
This bill aims to amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It seeks to prevent consumer reporting agencies from sharing consumer reports with others after a person requests a report for a residential mortgage loan.
Became law · 119-HR-2808
- Yes: Does this protect people from being watched or searched?The bill provides significant protection for individual privacy regarding sensitive financial information. +7
Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (27)
Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.
This bill updates the Northern Border Security Review Act by requiring regular updates to threat analysis and border strategies.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-5517
- Yes: Does this tighten control of the border?The bill enhances security through mandated strategy updates and performance measures for air and maritime environments. +5
This bill places strict purchasing limits and transparency rules on stock trading for Members of Congress, their spouses, and their dependent children.
Passed the House 232–198 · 119-HR-7008
- Yes: Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?The bill requires Members of Congress to publicly disclose intent to sell specific investments before doing so. +6
- No: Does this protect the right to vote?The bill imposes new photo identification requirements for all federal elections, which may create barriers to voting. -3
This bill aims to improve Federal technology procurement processes.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-4123
- Yes: Does this make it easier to run a small business?The bill increases procurement thresholds and directs the removal of barriers to help small businesses compete for Federal contracts. +6
And 24 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.
Resolutions of theirs that were adopted (1)
A resolution is a chamber speaking for itself — a position, a rule or a tribute. Adopting it puts it into effect, but it is not a law.
Still waiting, of the 41 bills they wrote: 40 are in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.
What their bills would do
Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().
Who their bills would affect
What else they would change
How they voted lately
Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The main purpose is to provide a clear definition of adequate consideration for certain closely held stock.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would retired people be better off under this?Improving the clarity of stock valuation for ESOPs supports more stable retirement transitions. +4
119-S-2403 · roll call 314
This Act provides for improvements to rivers and harbors in the United States and the conservation and development of water and related resources.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?Directly authorizes land transfers to Tribal entities and prioritizes technical assistance for Tribal communities. +8
- No: Does this reduce what the federal government spends?The bill explicitly increases spending limits and funding authorizations for dozens of regional water resource programs. -5
119-HR-9497 · roll call 313
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
119-HR-9340 · roll call 312
On the President’s vetoes
The President can refuse to sign a bill both chambers passed. It becomes law anyway only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to pass it again. A vote against the veto (a Yea) was a vote to make the bill law over the President’s objection; a vote for it (a Nay) was a vote to let the veto stand.
Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 248–177; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 236–188; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
How busy they have been
How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.