Bill · S.Res. 481· Senate(119-SRES-481)
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States Department of Agriculture should use its contingency funds and interchange authority to finance the supplemental nutrition assistance program.
- Introduced
- 11/3/2025
- Last activity
- 11/3/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
- Sponsored by
- Jeff Merkley
- Cosponsors
- - 43 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
S. Res. 481 expresses the sense of the Senate that the USDA should use contingency funds and interchange authority to fund the supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP). The resolution states that the administration is legally obligated to fund SNAP using these funds. It asserts that the administration has the authority and money to finance the program through November 2025. The goal is to ensure health and wellness for families experiencing hunger.
Yes· 3 of 21
Would children be better off under this?+10
Prevents food insecurity for 16 million children and prevents damage to their ability to learn.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+10
Directly impacts 8 million seniors who rely on SNAP.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+10
Directly provides food security to the lowest income households.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Prevention of Hunger: Using the contingency fund would provide food access for approximately 42,000,000 people, including 16,000,000 children, 8,000,000 seniors, 4,000,000 people with disabilities, and 1,200,000 veterans (Resolved, section 3).
-
Support for Children: Funding ensures children do not go without food, which prevents the deep damage to their ability to learn in school caused by persistent hunger (Whereas clause).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for people are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+10Good For Low Income Households+10Good For People With Disabilities+10Good For Retirees+10Good For Seniors+10Good For Veterans+10Good For Students+7Good For African Americans+5Good For Asian Americans+5Good For Hispanic Americans+5Good For Men+5Good For Middle Aged+5Good For Native Americans+5Good For Rural Residents+5Good For Urban Residents+5Good For White Americans+5Good For Women+5Good For Young Adults+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+10Reduces Homelessness+2
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+5
- 11/3/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
- 45 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jon OssoffDemocrat · Georgia
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts