Bill · H.Res. 856· House(119-HRES-856)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Department of Agriculture should use its contingency funds and interchange authority to finance the supplemental nutrition assistance program.
- Introduced
- 11/4/2025
- Last activity
- 12/2/2025 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- Sponsored by
- Suzanne Bonamici
- Cosponsors
- - 51 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Department of Agriculture should use its contingency funds and interchange authority to finance the supplemental nutrition assistance program. It highlights that Congress previously appropriated billions of dollars to the SNAP contingency fund to ensure program operations during emergencies like government shutdowns. The text notes that approximately 1 in 8 people in the United States rely on SNAP, including millions of children, seniors, people with disabilities, and veterans. It points out that the administration has both the legal obligation and the authority to use these funds and interchange powers to finance SNAP through November 2025. Finally, it urges the administration to immediately exercise this authority for the health and wellness of families experiencing hunger.
Yes· 3 of 8
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+6
Directly benefits low-income households relying on SNAP to avoid hunger and malnutrition.
Would children be better off under this?+5
Supports continued nutrition assistance for approximately 16,000,000 children at risk of hunger.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+5
Supports continued nutrition assistance for approximately 8,000,000 seniors.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Continued Food Access for Vulnerable Groups: The resolution states that the administration should use its contingency funds and interchange authority to finance SNAP, which would benefit the approximately 42,000,000 people who relied on the program in 2024 to avoid hunger or malnutrition. This includes about 16,000,000 children, 8,000,000 seniors, 4,000,000 people with disabilities, and 1,200,000 veterans who are at risk of going hungry. This positive outcome is supported by the resolved clauses (1), (3), and (4).
-
Support for Program Operations During Shutdowns: The text notes that multi-year contingency funds are available for State Administrative Expenses to ensure that states can continue operations during a federal government shutdown. This helps maintain the administrative backbone required to deliver nutrition assistance. This is explicitly mentioned in the preamble citing USDA guidance and referenced in resolved clause (1).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+6Good For Children+5Good For Seniors+5Good For People With Disabilities+4Good For Retirees+4Good For Veterans+4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+3
- 12/2/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
- 11/7/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 11/4/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- 48 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Cleo FieldsDemocrat · Louisiana
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Pablo HernándezDemocrat · Puerto Rico
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Haley StevensDemocrat · Michigan
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey