Bill · S.Res. 406· Senate(119-SRES-406)
A resolution designating September 30, 2025, as "Impact Aid Recognition Day" to recognize and celebrate the 75th anniversary of the establishment of the Impact Aid program.
- Introduced
- 9/18/2025
- Last activity
- 10/6/2025 — Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6959; text: CR 9/18/2025 S6737)
- Sponsored by
- Mazie Hirono
- Cosponsors
- - 18 - 8
- Introduced
- Adopted by the Senate
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
S. Res. 406 designates September 30, 2025, as "Impact Aid Recognition Day." This day celebrates the 75th anniversary of the Impact Aid program, which was established by the Act of September 30, 1950. The resolution recognizes the program's role in providing funds to local educational agencies to offset revenue losses from tax-exempt Federal property. It also acknowledges the program's goal of ensuring children in federally impacted school districts receive a high-quality education.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would children be better off under this?+7
The bill celebrates a program designed to ensure children in federally impacted districts receive high-quality education.
Would students be better off under this?+7
The bill recognizes a program that provides essential funding to ensure students in impacted districts have quality education.
Does this put more money into public schools?+5
The bill recognizes and celebrates the Impact Aid program which provides funding to local educational agencies.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for students in federally impacted districts: The program aims to ensure children in these districts get a high-quality education and opportunities to reach their full potential. This is noted in section (2)(B).
-
Funding for local schools: Local educational agencies receive reimbursements for lost revenue and costs caused by tax-exempt Federal property, which allows them to provide quality education based on local needs. This is mentioned in the "Whereas" clauses regarding program administration.
-
Benefits for specific groups of children: The program serves over 600,000 "federally connected children," including those of uniformed services members, children on Indian lands, those in low-rent public housing, and children of civilians on Federal land. This is detailed in the "Whereas" clauses.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for people are mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+7Good For Students+7Good For Native Americans+4Good For Low Income Households+3
- Education And Technology
- Increases Public School Funding+5
- 10/6/2025
- Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6959; text: CR 9/18/2025 S6737)
- 9/18/2025
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S6737)
- 26 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
John ThuneRepublican · South Dakota
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island