Bill · H.Res. 786· House(119-HRES-786)
Supporting the designation of September 30, 2025, as "Impact Aid Recognition Day" to recognize and celebrate the 75th anniversary of the establishment of the Impact Aid program.
- Introduced
- 10/3/2025
- Last activity
- 10/3/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- Sponsored by
- Dan Newhouse
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 11
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution supports designating September 30, 2025, as ``Impact Aid Recognition Day.'' This designation celebrates the 75th anniversary of the establishment of the Impact Aid program. The program was originally established by the Act of September 30, 1950. The resolution recognizes the importance of the program and its objective to provide high-quality education to children in Federally impacted school districts.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would children be better off under this?+5
The Impact Aid program ensures children in federally impacted districts receive a high-quality education and access to opportunities.
Would students be better off under this?+5
The program aims to ensure that students in federally impacted districts have access to the opportunities needed to reach their full potential.
Does this put more money into public schools?+5
The resolution recognizes the Impact Aid program which provides billions of dollars in reimbursements to local educational agencies for high-quality education.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Local Educational Agencies: The Impact Aid program reimburses local educational agencies for costs and loss of revenue caused by tax-exempt Federal property within their boundaries (Whereas clause 4).
-
Educational Quality for Students: The program allows local educational agencies to allocate payments based on local context and needs to provide a quality education to students (Whereas clause 5).
-
Support for Specific Student Groups: The program serves more than 600,000 "federally connected children," including children of individuals in the uniformed services, children residing on Indian lands, children in low-rent public housing, and children of civilians working or living on Federal land (Whereas clause 6).
-
Access to Opportunity: The program has the objective of ensuring that all children educated in Federally impacted school districts receive a high-quality education and have access to opportunities to reach their full potential (Resolution section 2B).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+5Good For Students+5Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Native Americans+3
- Education And Technology
- Increases Public School Funding+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- 10/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 16 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Michael SimpsonRepublican · Idaho
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Elise StefanikRepublican · New York
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas