Bill · S.Res. 697· Senate(119-SRES-697)
A resolution welcoming Their Majesties King Charles III and Queen Camilla of the United Kingdom to the United States on the occasion of His Majesty's address to a joint meeting of Congress, and recognizing the historic global significance of the United States-United Kingdom relationship.
- Introduced
- 4/28/2026
- Last activity
- 4/28/2026 — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
- Sponsored by
- James Risch
- Cosponsors
- - 14 - 17
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution welcomes King Charles III and Queen Camilla of the United Kingdom on their official state visit to the United States. The visit coincides with the King's address to a joint meeting of Congress and the 250th anniversary of United States independence. The Senate aims to recognize the historic global significance of the relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom. Furthermore, the resolution reaffirms the strong partnership between the two nations to protect common values and interests. Finally, it encourages increased cooperation on strategic security matters in Europe and the Indo-Pacific.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+5
The resolution reaffirms the strong, historic, and enduring partnership between the United States and the United Kingdom.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+1
The resolution highlights the long-standing military and security partnership between the two nations.
Does this make trade with other countries easier?+1
The resolution highlights the technology prosperity deal as a means to deepen scientific and industrial cooperation.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Scientific and Technological Advancement: Cooperation and educational exchanges between the U.S. and UK have led to groundbreaking scientific innovations in information technology and industrial production, which will be furthered by the U.S.-UK Technology Prosperity Deal established on September 18, 2025 (Whereas clause regarding scientific innovations).
-
Global Security and Peace: The partnership aims to advance peace, security, and prosperity for citizens and the broader international community through shared interests and strategic cooperation (Resolution section 3).
-
National Security Defense: The United Kingdom acts as a close security partner, hosting over 10,000 United States military personnel and assisting in the defense of U.S. national security through various alliances (Whereas clause regarding security partners).
-
Support for Global Values and Stability: The two nations share an interest in working with partners in the European Union to protect Western values and advance strategic competitiveness against rivals such as China, Russia, and Iran (Whereas clause regarding common interests).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+5Improves International Trade+1Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+1
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+1
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+1
- 4/28/2026
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
- 32 Cosponsors added.
- Bill introduced.
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Tim ScottRepublican · South Carolina
John ThuneRepublican · South Dakota
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island