Bill · S.Res. 105· Senate(119-SRES-105)
A resolution condemning the mass terminations of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs carried out with no justification or analysis of the impact on veterans and their families.
- Introduced
- 3/4/2025
- Last activity
- 3/4/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs. (text: CR S1500)
- Sponsored by
- Richard Blumenthal
- Cosponsors
- - 31 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution condemns the mass termination of employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs. It highlights that Secretary Doug Collins announced the termination of 1,000 employees on February 13, 2025, and an additional 1,400 employees on February 24, 2025. The resolution states these actions were carried out without justification or analysis of the impact on veterans and their families. It notes that Senators have attempted to obtain information regarding the impacts on essential services and the involvement of unauthorized personnel but have not received it. Finally, the resolution expresses the sense of the Senate that these terminations should be condemned and all affected employees should be reinstated.
Yes· 3 of 12
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+8
Reinstating staff would restore essential medical services, crisis lines, and benefits administration for veterans.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+8
Reinstating staff would restore essential services like claims processing and caregiver support lines.
Does this make mental health care easier to get?+7
Reinstating employees would restore the Veterans Crisis Line and mental health services.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-5
Reinstating 2,400 employees would increase federal spending on payroll.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Reinstatement of Employees: The resolution calls for all affected employees to be reinstated, which would address the concerns of the veterans and employees who have expressed worry about the terminations.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Essential Services: The terminations have reportedly led to the suspension of service lines, beds, and operating rooms at Department hospitals and clinics.
-
Health Risks: The mass terminations have resulted in the cancellation or postponement of mammogram and other time-sensitive appointments.
-
Reduced Support for Caregivers: There has been a reduction of support lines for caregivers due to these actions.
-
Threats to Crisis Support: The termination of Veterans Crisis Line employees poses a potential risk to those seeking immediate help.
-
Impact on Research and Security: The terminations include employees performing critical research and cyber security personnel who protect the Department's websites.
-
Loss of Vet Center Staff: The workforce reduction has included the termination of Vet Center staff.
-
Economic and Morale Damage: The mass terminations are considered damaging to the economic security and morale of veterans and their families.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+7Improves Mental Health Access+7Increases Research Funding+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+8Good For Union Workers+5Good For Low Income Households+3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+8Improves Cybersecurity Defense+7
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+6
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+3
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+5Reduces Government Spending-5
- 3/4/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs. (text: CR S1500)
- 32 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts