Bill · S.Con.Res. 6· Senate(119-SCONRES-6)
A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that tax-exempt fraternal benefit societies have historically provided and continue to provide critical benefits to the people and communities of the United States.
- Introduced
- 1/24/2025
- Last activity
- 1/24/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S374)
- Sponsored by
- Mike Crapo
- Cosponsors
- - 17 - 14
- Introduced
- In Committee
A concurrent resolution is how the Senate and the House settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
This text is a resolution from the Senate and House of Representatives about tax-exempt fraternal benefit societies. It highlights that these groups have historically provided and continue to provide critical benefits to the people and communities of the United States. The text notes that these societies operate as mutual aid organizations to serve community needs and provide life, health, accident, and other benefits to their members. It points out that Congress originally exempted these organizations from taxation in 1909 under section 501(c)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code. Finally, the resolution states it is the sense of Congress that this tax exemption should continue because these societies provide significant returns and support to the country.
Yes· 3 of 30
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
Provides an alternative support system for those with unmet needs that the government cannot address.
Would people in middle age be better off under this?+2
Beneficiaries of life, health, and accident benefits.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+2
Beneficiaries of life and health benefits and community support networks.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Charitable and Fraternal Activities: The text states in resolution paragraph (2) that providing payment for life, health, accident, and other benefits in accordance with section 501(c)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code is necessary to support the charitable and fraternal activities of volunteer chapters in communities. This is positive because it helps maintain the member-volunteer network and local charitable work.
-
Relief for Government Programs: The text notes that the efforts of fraternal benefit societies to help people save money and be financially secure relieves pressure on government safety net programs. This can be viewed as a positive outcome for the public as it strengthens community support systems.
-
Economic and Social Support: According to resolution paragraph (1), the fraternal benefit society model is a successful private sector economic and social support system that helps meet needs that would otherwise go unmet. This provides a clear benefit to individuals and local communities relying on this nationwide infrastructure.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Middle Aged+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Retirees+2Good For Rural Residents+2Good For Seniors+2Good For Urban Residents+2Good For African Americans+1Good For Asian Americans+1Good For Children+1Good For Farmers+1Good For Hispanic Americans+1Good For Immigrants+1Good For L G B T Q Community+1Good For Men+1Good For Native Americans+1Good For People With Disabilities+1Good For Students+1Good For Union Workers+1Good For Veterans+1Good For White Americans+1Good For Women+1Good For Young Adults+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+1Improves Fiscal Responsibility+1Reduces Government Spending+1Reduces National Debt+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+2Reduces Homelessness+1
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+2
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/24/2025
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S374)
- 19 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Tim ScottRepublican · South Carolina
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
John ThuneRepublican · South Dakota
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana