Bill · S. 2799· Senate(119-S-2799)
Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act
- Introduced
- 9/15/2025
- Last activity
- 9/15/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Richard Blumenthal
- Cosponsors
- - 33 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act" aims to amend title 9 of the United States Code regarding arbitration. This bill seeks to prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force the arbitration of future employment, consumer, antitrust, or civil rights disputes. Additionally, it prohibits agreements and practices that interfere with the rights of individuals, workers, and small businesses to participate in joint, class, or collective actions. Under this Act, such agreements and waivers would no longer be considered valid or enforceable. The law also specifies that courts, rather than arbitrators, will determine the applicability and validity of these agreements.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+7
The bill prohibits predispute arbitration agreements for consumer disputes, allowing consumers to seek judicial relief or join class actions.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+6
The bill shifts the determination of arbitration agreement validity from private arbitrators to public courts.
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?+5
The bill ensures that civil rights disputes cannot be forced into private arbitration, preserving the ability to pursue public legal remedies for discrimination.
The opposite
Would union members be better off under this?-2
The bill explicitly excludes collective bargaining agreements from the protections of this chapter, except for specific constitutional or statutory rights.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Rights in Disputes: The bill prohibits the use of predispute arbitration agreements and joint-action waivers for employment, consumer, antitrust, or civil rights disputes (Section 2; Section 3(a) Sec. 502(a)). This ensures people can seek resolution through other means rather than being forced into arbitration for future disputes.
-
Preservation of Collective Action: By prohibiting agreements that interfere with the right to participate in a joint, class, or collective action, the bill protects the ability of individuals, workers, and small businesses to act together regarding their disputes (Section 2).
-
Empowerment of Judicial Oversight: The bill mandates that a court, rather than an arbitrator, determines whether the chapter applies to an agreement and whether that agreement is valid or enforceable (Section 3(a) Sec. 502(b)(1)).
-
Expanded Coverage for Workers: The definition of an employment dispute includes disputes involving individuals regardless of whether they are classified as employees or independent contractors (Section 3(a) Sec. 501(4)(A)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Impact on Collective Bargaining: The bill specifies that nothing in the chapter applies to arbitration provisions in contracts between an employer and a labor organization or between labor organizations, except for specific rights regarding the Constitution or statutes (Section 3(a) Sec. 502(b)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+5Improves Poverty Reduction+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+7
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Union Workers-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+6
- 9/15/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 34 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts