Bill · H.Res. 668· House(119-HRES-668)
Directing the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to continue its ongoing investigation into the possible mismanagement of the Federal government’s investigation of Mr. Jeffrey Epstein and Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 9/2/2025
- Last activity
- 9/3/2025 — Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 672, H. Res. 668 is considered passed House. (consideration: CR H3780; text: CR H3780)
- Sponsored by
- Brian Jack
- Cosponsors
- - 8 - 0
- Introduced
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution directs the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to continue its ongoing investigation into the potential mismanagement of the Federal Government's investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It also covers the circumstances of Epstein's death, sex-trafficking rings, and potential ethics rule violations by elected officials. The House of Representatives supports subpoenas and investigatory actions authorized by the committee chair and encourages timely compliance. Furthermore, the committee is instructed to issue investigative reports as it deems necessary. Finally, the chair is required to make all unclassified committee records publicly available, subject to specific permitted withholdings and redactions.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8
The resolution mandates the public release of unclassified records and documents related to the federal government's investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, significantly enhancing governmental transparency.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+4
The legislation provides explicit protections to withhold or redact personally identifiable information and personal files of victims to prevent unwarranted privacy invasions.
Does this give the federal government more power?+2
The resolution directs ongoing congressional committee investigations and document releases regarding federal agencies and law enforcement handling of a high-profile case.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Transparency and Accountability: Under Section 3(a), the chair of the committee must make unclassified records publicly available, including flight logs, communications, and documents related to Epstein, Maxwell, and government officials. This is positive because it brings public visibility to how the government handled these matters and holds officials accountable.
-
Protection of Victims: Under Section 3(b)(2)(A)(i), the chair is permitted to withhold or redact personally identifiable information of victims or their personal and medical files. This protects victims from an unwarranted invasion of privacy and prevents the identification of victims.
-
Safeguarding Active Investigations: Under Section 3(b)(2)(A)(iii), records may be withheld or redacted if they would jeopardize an active Federal investigation or ongoing prosecution. This ensures that the public release of documents does not interfere with ongoing law enforcement work.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Potential for Delayed Disclosures: Under Section 3(b)(2)(A)(iii), the release of certain records can be delayed if they jeopardize an active federal investigation or prosecution. While intended to protect law enforcement, this means the public may have to wait longer to see specific documents.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+8Improves Privacy Rights+4Increases Federal Power+2
- 9/3/2025
- Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 672, H. Res. 668 is considered passed House.
- Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 672, H. Res. 668 is considered passed House. (consideration: CR H3780; text: CR H3780)
- 9/2/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Virginia FoxxRepublican · North Carolina
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Erin HouchinRepublican · Indiana
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Austin ScottRepublican · Georgia