The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee28 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Jun 30
This resolution recognizes the upcoming 250th anniversary of the United States.
Yes· 2 of 10
Would immigrants be better off under this?+6The resolution focuses on overcoming barriers like language access, employment obstacles, and legal hurdles faced by immigrants.
Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?+5The resolution supports expanding naturalization services to help immigrants achieve stability and full participation.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Homeland Security, Armed Services, House Administration, Financial Services, Energy and Commerce, Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · May 12
This resolution calls for a renewed mandate for human rights to address interconnected pain, violence, and oppression experienced by the global majority.
Yes· 2 of 47
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+10The resolution calls for the global adoption of free universal health care.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+9The bill prioritizes living wages, affordable housing, and social safety nets.
The opposite· 2 of 9
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-8The resolution specifically advocates for defunding and taxing billionaires.
Would high-income households be better off under this?-7The bill calls for higher taxes on billionaires and megacorporations.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Apr 28
This bill aims to establish a Federal minimum wage that aligns with the national median wage.
Yes· 2 of 11
Would workers who earn tips be better off under this?+8The bill eliminates subminimum wages for tipped employees and grants them the specific right to retain all tips received.
Would hourly workers be better off under this?+8The bill significantly increases the minimum wage to $25 per hour and ends subminimum wages for tipped and disabled workers.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-5Business owners face increased labor costs due to the mandatory wage hikes.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?-4Smaller employers face a much slower wage increase schedule compared to large corporations, which may create relative financial pressure.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Financial Services · Apr 20
This resolution, introduced by Mrs. Ramirez and several colleagues, addresses the impact of the Trump administration's proposal regarding mixed-status families and housing.
Yes· 2 of 11
Would immigrants be better off under this?+8The resolution opposes rules that would evict and separate mixed-status immigrant families.
Would children be better off under this?+7The resolution seeks to protect nearly 37,000 children from losing their housing assistance due to proposed rule changes.
This bill aims to change how family and medical leave is determined for Department of Veterans Affairs employees. It proposes to treat the parent of a covered employee's spouse as if they were the employee's own parent.
Yes· 2 of 5
Does this give workers paid sick days or paid family leave?+10The bill expands eligibility for family and medical leave by deeding a spouse's parent as the employee's own parent.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+2The bill specifically benefits employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs by expanding their family leave entitlements.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability · Feb 26
This bill seeks to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002. It specifically prohibits the Secretary of Homeland Security from using Federal funds to acquire or use full-body restraints.
Yes· 2 of 7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5The bill mandates regular reports to Congress regarding compliance and any violations of the restraint prohibition.
Would immigrants be better off under this?+3The bill provides increased accountability and documentation regarding the treatment and status of individuals in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security.
The opposite
Does this tighten control of the border?-1The bill restricts the methods and equipment available to Department of Homeland Security personnel involved in security and enforcement.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1The bill prohibits the expenditure of Federal funds for the acquisition of full-body restraints.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Feb 12
This bill requires every employer in the United States to provide their workers with a retirement program that offers benefits equivalent to the Federal Employees Retirement System, or alternatively, to have their emplo…
Yes· 2 of 15
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+7The bill enhances long-term retirement security for future retirees by mandating comprehensive pension and savings plans.
Would retired people be better off under this?+7Ensures comprehensive retirement systems and stronger overall framework for long-term financial security.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-3Business owners face increased administrative responsibilities and potential mandatory financial contributions or tax penalties for noncompliance.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary · Jan 22
This bill aims to amend the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. It seeks to expand the scope of individuals and activities that are subject to current disclosure requirements.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6The bill expands disclosure requirements to include strategic counseling and lowers the threshold for registration, making more lobbying activity public.
Does this limit the influence of paid lobbyists?+4The bill increases transparency and the threshold for registration, which limits the influence of unregistered lobbying activities.
The opposite
Would high-income households be better off under this?-3The bill increases regulatory and registration burdens on high-income earners who engage in strategic counseling and lobbying.
Would business owners be better off under this?-3The bill increases the compliance and registration burden for those providing strategic counseling and lobbying services.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Border Security and Enforcement · Jan 22
This bill aims to end immigration detention and electronic monitoring. It requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to release detained noncitizens on their own recognizance within six months.
Yes· 2 of 14
Would immigrants be better off under this?+9The bill abolishes detention, removes electronic monitoring, and provides social services.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+7The bill provides social services like housing, healthcare, and employment assistance.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-8The bill actively seeks to reduce surveillance by removing ankle monitors and prohibiting monitoring in services.
Does this tighten control of the border?-7The bill repeals key detention and inspection authorities used for border enforcement.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Border Security and Enforcement · Jan 16
This bill amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require a Department-wide policy on the use of force and deescalation for law enforcement officers and agents.
Yes· 2 of 6
Does this change how police departments operate?+7The bill mandates deescalation, prohibits chokeholds, and establishes expert oversight and public reporting for DHS law enforcement.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6The bill requires the publication of detailed use of force data and incident summaries on a public website.
The opposite
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?-1The requirement to publish specific incident data and circumstances may create minor privacy risks despite specified protections.
