David P. Joyce
Republican · Representative for Ohio's 14th district
21 sponsored · 129 cosponsored
In the House since 2013
Age 69
Contact their office: (202) 225-5731 · 2065 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 · Official website
In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)
- Sponsored 21 bills.The typical House member sponsored 25. Bills they wrote, not ones they signed on to.
- 1 bill they backed became law.They cosponsored it.
- 14 passed the House and wait on the Senate.And 2 have passed both chambers and gone to the President.
- Missed 22 of 676 recorded votes (3.3%).The typical House member missed 1.9%. The record doesn’t say why.
- Works most on health and armed forces and national security.27 and 24 of the 150 bills they wrote or backed.
What they got done
Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.
Became law (1)
This Act authorizes the award of 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. The medals recognize the team's victory over the Soviet Union during the 1980 Winter Olympics.
Became law · 119-HR-452
Passed Congress — the President's turn (2)
Both chambers passed it. The President signs it into law or vetoes it, and a veto stands unless two-thirds of each chamber vote to pass it anyway. Everything Congress has sent the President →
- They cosponsoredAccelerating Access to Critical Therapies for ALS Reauthorization Act of 2026Sep 28, 2026
This bill extends the provisions and grants for ALS research found in the original Act through fiscal year 2031.
Passed the Senate by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-8205
- Yes: Does this put more money into medical research?The bill extends the authorization of grants for ALS research through fiscal year 2031. +7
This bill requires online dating service providers to send fraud ban notifications to members who have communicated with someone whose account was banned for fraud.
Passed the Senate with no one objecting, no names recorded · 119-HR-2481
- Yes: Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?The bill enhances consumer protection by requiring dating services to notify users of potential fraud risks. +5
- No: Does this leave more decisions to the states?The bill restricts the ability of states and political subdivisions to maintain or enforce their own dating service notification standards. -4
Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (14)
Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.
This bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), to set up a pilot program.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-9327
This bill aims to fight organized crime that involves stealing retail goods and cargo to sell through physical and online markets.
Passed the House 348–60 · 119-HR-2853
- Yes: Would business owners be better off under this?The bill directly addresses the theft and financial losses faced by retailers and manufacturers. +5
This bill requires public elementary and secondary schools to disclose certain financial information.
Passed the House 242–176 · 119-HR-1005
- Yes: Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?The bill requires schools to disclose the source, amount, and terms of significant foreign funding or contracts to the Secretary of Education. +5
And 11 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.
Still waiting, of the 21 bills they wrote: 2 cleared committee and wait for a first vote, 16 are in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.
What their bills would do
Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().
Who their bills would affect
What else they would change
How they voted lately
Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The main purpose is to provide a clear definition of adequate consideration for certain closely held stock.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would retired people be better off under this?Improving the clarity of stock valuation for ESOPs supports more stable retirement transitions. +4
119-S-2403 · roll call 314
This Act provides for improvements to rivers and harbors in the United States and the conservation and development of water and related resources.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?Directly authorizes land transfers to Tribal entities and prioritizes technical assistance for Tribal communities. +8
- No: Does this reduce what the federal government spends?The bill explicitly increases spending limits and funding authorizations for dozens of regional water resource programs. -5
119-HR-9497 · roll call 313
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
119-HR-9340 · roll call 312
On the President’s vetoes
The President can refuse to sign a bill both chambers passed. It becomes law anyway only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to pass it again. A vote against the veto (a Yea) was a vote to make the bill law over the President’s objection; a vote for it (a Nay) was a vote to let the veto stand.
Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 248–177; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
Against the vetovoted Yea, to make the bill law anyway.
The override fell short in the House, 236–188; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
How busy they have been
How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.