The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee14 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Sep 16
This bill amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to expand the Magnet Schools Assistance Program.
Yes· 2 of 16
Would students be better off under this?+7Students benefit from enhanced curricula, free transportation, social-emotional learning support, and improved school climates.
Does this put more money into public schools?+7The legislation authorizes appropriations for the Magnet Schools Assistance Program and creates supplemental diversity grants through fiscal year 2031.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Sep 14
This bill stops the use of funds from the fiscal year 2027 Department of Defense budget to sell, donate, or transfer any aircraft from the VC-25B Bridge program outside of the Department of the Air Force.
Yes· 2 of 3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3The bill prevents off-budget or unapproved transfers of major executive airlift assets, enhancing oversight of Department of Defense resources.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+2By protecting military assets and investments within the Department of the Air Force, the bill supports the broader defense framework.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Jul 16
This bill seeks to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. It proposes the creation of a grant program to support law school programs, such as clinics, externships, or pro bono programs.
Yes· 2 of 13
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+4The bill provides legal assistance to beneficiaries to challenge denied benefits and healthcare provider disputes.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+4The bill provides legal resources to help participants secure benefits they are entitled to receive.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · May 20
This bill requires the Secretary of Defense to align the Job Corps program with the needs of the defense industrial base.
Yes· 2 of 10
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+6The bill specifically streamlines the enrollment of veterans into the defense industrial base through Job Corps.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+5The bill provides specialized vocational training and career paths for young people entering the workforce.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Apr 23
This resolution recognizes the significance of ``Community College Month'' in April. It celebrates more than 1,000 institutions that support higher education access and workforce training.
Yes· 2 of 8
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+2The text states that community colleges serve low-income students by providing affordable access to higher education.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+2The resolution highlights how dual enrollment and community colleges allow students to jumpstart career exploration and save money.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Apr 9
This joint resolution aims to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Department of Education. The rule in question concerns the "William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program."
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 2 of 5
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?-5The disapproval of the rule regarding the Federal Direct Loan Program may negatively impact young adults who rely on these federal loans.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-5Nullifying rules related to federal student loans can negatively impact low-income households that depend on these programs for educational access.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Mar 24
This bill aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to remove interest from student loans. The bill establishes the Education Affordability Trust Fund to manage funds derived from loan repayments.
Yes· 2 of 9
Would students be better off under this?+10The bill provides direct relief by eliminating interest on existing and future federal student loans.
Does this make college cost less?+10The bill eliminates interest on existing and new federal student loans and creates a supplemental Pell grant program to lower costs.
The opposite
Would people over 65 be better off under this?-2The termination of interest-subsidized loans could reduce the overall availability of certain types of educational financial assistance.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jun 12
This bill amends title XVIII of the Social Security Act. The main goal is to count a time of receiving outpatient observation services in a hospital toward the 3-day inpatient hospital stay requirement.
Yes· 2 of 22
Would retired people be better off under this?+9Directly benefits retirees by easing the requirements for Medicare coverage in nursing facilities.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+9Primarily benefits seniors by expanding their access to Medicare-covered skilled nursing care.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?-1Expansion of benefit eligibility without a designated funding source may negatively impact fiscal balance.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1Increasing eligibility for Medicare-covered services generally leads to higher government expenditures.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Apr 28
This bill amends the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to expand workplace safety coverage, bolster protections for whistleblowers, and significantly raise penalties for violations.
Yes· 2 of 7
Would union members be better off under this?+8The bill provides significant new protections for whistleblowers and employee representatives.
Does this give the federal government more power?+7The bill expands federal jurisdiction over public employees and increases the authority of the Secretary of Labor.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Would business owners be better off under this?-6The bill imposes much higher civil and criminal penalties on employers.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-4The bill increases federal oversight and evaluation of State-administered safety plans.
