Bill · S.Res. 81· Senate(119-SRES-81)
A resolution calling on the United Kingdom, France, and Germany (E3) to initiate the snapback of sanctions on Iran under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
- Introduced
- 2/13/2025
- Last activity
- 2/13/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S982)
- Sponsored by
- Pete Ricketts
- Cosponsors
- - 19 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
S. Res. 81 is a resolution calling on the United Kingdom, France, and Germany (E3) to use the "snapback" mechanism to restore United Nations sanctions on Iran. The resolution states that Iran has repeatedly violated its commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and UN Security Council Resolution 2231. It highlights Iran's increased uranium enrichment and the threat of it acquiring nuclear weapons. The Senate aims to deter further proliferation and protect global security. The resolution urges this action to happen before the snapback option expires on October 18, 2025.
Yes
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+6
The resolution calls for coordinated action between the US, UK, France, and Germany.
Does this put more money into stopping terrorism?+5
The resolution aims to stop the funding of terrorist proxies through robust sanctions.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Global and National Security: The resolution recognizes that preventing Iran from possessing a nuclear weapon protects the security of the United States, its allies, and partners in Europe and the Middle East (Resolved section 1).
- Deterrence of Malign Activities: The resolution supports robust sanctions to deter further proliferation efforts and stop the funding of terrorist proxies and regional aggression (Whereas clauses and Resolved section 5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts for individuals or groups in the United States are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+6Increases Counter Terrorism Funding+5
| Updated | Bill | Title | Policy Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year ago | To amend the preamble. | ||
| 1 year ago | In the nature of a substitute. |
- 5/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/13/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S982)
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana