Bill · H.Res. 139· House(119-HRES-139)
Calling on the United Kingdom, France, and Germany (E3) to initiate the snapback of sanctions on Iran under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
- Introduced
- 2/14/2025
- Last activity
- 2/14/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Claudia Tenney
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution calls on the United Kingdom, France, and Germany to start the process of bringing back United Nations sanctions on Iran before the option expires on October 18, 2025. It points out that Iran has broken the rules of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 by lifting uranium caps, increasing enrichment, and blocking monitors. The text highlights statements from international leaders and the International Atomic Energy Agency showing that Iran's advanced nuclear program poses a major threat to global peace. Furthermore, the House of Representatives condemns Iran's actions and the support it receives from Russia and China. Finally, the bill reaffirms the right of the United States to take necessary measures to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons.
Yes
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+3
The resolution calls for coordinated action by the E3 and the US to uphold international agreements and security.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+1
The resolution aims to enhance global security by preventing nuclear proliferation which protects national interests.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline positive outcomes or benefits for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+3Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- 4/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/14/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
J. HillRepublican · Arkansas
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Doug LaMalfaRepublican · California
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas