Bill · S.Res. 108· Senate(119-SRES-108)
A resolution affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review.
- Introduced
- 3/5/2025
- Last activity
- 3/5/2025 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1583)
- Sponsored by
- Richard Durbin
- Cosponsors
- - 20 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution affirms the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review. It notes that the Constitution establishes three separate branches of government and vests judicial power in the Supreme Court and inferior courts. The text highlights that the Supreme Court established the principle of judicial review through Marbury v. Madison. It addresses remarks made by Vice President Vance and other officials regarding the executive branch's authority to ignore the judiciary. Finally, it states that such actions would cause a constitutional crisis. The Senate resolves to affirm judicial power and the requirement that the executive branch comply with court rulings.
Yes
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+5
Upholding the requirement that the executive comply with court decisions protects the legal rights of individuals against unchecked executive power.
Does this give the federal government more power?+3
The resolution bolsters the authority of the federal judiciary to check the actions of the executive branch.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2
By affirming judicial review, the resolution supports a system of checks and balances that maintains government accountability.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Ensures Constitutional Order: By affirming that the executive branch must comply with all Federal court rulings, the resolution seeks to prevent a constitutional crisis (Whereas clauses).
-
Protects Judicial Authority: The resolution reaffirms that the judicial department has the duty to say what the law is, which upholds the principle of judicial review established in Marbury v. Madison (Resolution section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+5Increases Federal Power+3Improves Government Transparency+2
| Updated | Bill | Title | Policy Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year ago | To improve the resolution. | ||
| 1 year ago | To improve the preamble. |
- 3/5/2025
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1583)
- 20 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Jon OssoffDemocrat · Georgia
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island