DemocratBill · S.Res. 136· Senate(119-SRES-136)

A resolution affirming the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review.

Rep. Durbin
Age: 82 years
Illinois
Introduced
3/25/2025
Last activity
3/25/2025 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1837-1838)
Sponsored by
Richard Durbin
Cosponsors
Democrat - 16Republican - 0
Law
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution affirms the rule of law and the legitimacy of judicial review. It states that Article III of the Constitution grants judicial power to one Supreme Court and inferior courts established by Congress. The resolution cites the precedent from Marbury v. Madison that it is the duty of the judicial department to define what the law is. It further asserts that the executive branch must comply with all Federal court rulings. Finally, it notes that the executive branch may appeal a ruling if authorized by law.

Yes

  • Does this give the federal government more power?+3

    The resolution emphasizes judicial review and the obligation of the executive branch to comply with federal court rulings.

  • Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+3

    Reinforcing the judicial branch's authority protects the rule of law and individual due process rights against executive overreach.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2

    Affirming judicial oversight helps ensure executive accountability through established legal channels.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.