Bill · S. 537· Senate(119-S-537)
Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 2/12/2025
- Last activity
- 2/12/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Steve Daines
- Cosponsors
- - 36 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025. It stops the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from banning the use of lead ammunition or tackle on certain federal lands and waters. It also stops these officials from making new rules about the level of lead in ammunition or tackle used on those lands. There is an exception if a specific unit of land has a wildlife population decline primarily caused by lead, as proven by field data. Any such exception must also be consistent with state law, consistent with state wildlife policy, or approved by the state fish and wildlife department. Finally, the applicable Secretary must publish a notice in the Federal Register explaining how any enacted prohibition or regulation meets these requirements.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would gun owners be better off under this?+5
The bill protects the use of traditional lead ammunition for hunting and fishing activities.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+3
The bill preserves traditional hunting and fishing practices often central to rural lifestyles.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+3
The bill requires that any lead prohibitions be consistent with State wildlife policies and laws.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-4
The bill restricts the authority of federal Secretaries to implement broad ammunition regulations.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-3
By restricting federal authority to ban lead ammunition, the bill may reduce protections for wildlife and ecosystems.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?-2
The bill limits the ability of agencies to manage federal lands through lead-based ammunition restrictions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection for hunters and anglers: Under section 2(a), the bill stops the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from banning lead ammunition or tackle on federal land and water made available for hunting or fishing, which benefits people who use these materials.
-
Limits on federal rule-making: Section 2(a)(2) prevents the applicable Secretary from issuing regulations relating to the level of lead in ammunition or tackle to be used on those federal lands or waters.
-
State authority protection: Under section 2(b)(2), any lead ban or regulation on a specific unit of land must be consistent with state law, consistent with state wildlife policy, or approved by the state fish and wildlife department, which gives local state voices a say in the decisions.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Wildlife population decline exceptions: Under section 2(b), the protections against lead bans do not apply if an applicable Secretary determines that a decline in wildlife population at a specific land or water unit is primarily caused by the use of lead in ammunition or tackle based on field data, which could lead to prohibitions for individuals using those items.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Gun Owners+5Good For Rural Residents+3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-3Improves Public Land Management-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+3Improves Government Transparency+1Increases Federal Power-4
- 9/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/12/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 29 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
- Darline Graham
Republican · South Carolina
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
John ThuneRepublican · South Dakota
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana