Bill · S. 4701· Senate(119-S-4701)
Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 6/8/2026
- Last activity
- 6/8/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Catherine Cortez Masto
- Cosponsors
- - 34 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act of 2026. It protects the ability of individuals to travel across state lines to receive or provide reproductive health care that is legal in the destination state. The legislation makes it unlawful for any person or government to restrict, sanction, hold liable, or discriminate against those who travel for these medical services. It also prohibits penalizing anyone who assists a person in traveling for legal reproductive health care. Furthermore, the bill prevents states from enforcing laws that conflict with these travel protections. Finally, the legislation establishes enforcement mechanisms, allowing the Attorney General, individuals, and health care providers to sue in court if these rights are violated.
Yes· 3 of 13
Would women be better off under this?+8
Women receive direct protection when traveling across state lines to obtain legal reproductive health care services.
Does this make abortion easier to get?+8
The bill protects the ability of individuals to travel across state lines to receive legal reproductive health care and safeguards providers from penalties.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+7
Young adults of reproductive age benefit significantly from guaranteed travel protections to access legal healthcare services.
The opposite
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-6
The bill overrides and preempts state laws that restrict travel for reproductive health care and removes traditional state immunities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection for Traveling Patients: Under Section 3(a)(1), it is unlawful for any person or government to restrict, sanction, hold liable, or discriminate against individuals traveling to another state to receive legal reproductive health care. This ensures that patients can seek medical services without fear of punishment.
-
Safeguards for People Providing Assistance: According to Section 3(a)(2), individuals, entities, and organizations are protected from being restricted, sanctioned, or held liable for helping someone travel to another state to receive or provide legal reproductive health care. This benefits family members, friends, and support networks who help patients travel.
-
Protection for Out-of-State Health Care Providers: Section 3(a)(4) stops governments from penalizing health care providers for offering legal reproductive health services to patients who do not live in that state, provided the care is legal for local residents. This helps ensure that out-of-state patients can access medical care.
-
Legal Remedies and Cost Recovery: Under Section 3(c)(2) and Section 3(c)(5), any person or entity adversely affected by a violation can file a civil action in court, and prevailing plaintiffs are awarded litigation costs and reasonable attorney's fees without being liable for the defendant's costs. This gives everyday people a practical way to fight back against unlawful restrictions.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Preemption of State Laws: According to Section 3(b), any state law that is inconsistent with the bill's provisions is preempted and has no legal effect. This means that certain state or local laws restricting travel for reproductive care will be completely wiped out, which may impose burdens on states and local governments that wish to enforce their own local rules.
-
Abrogation of State Immunity: Under Section 3(c)(7), states and government officials lose their traditional protections, such as the Tenth Amendment, Eleventh Amendment, sovereign immunity, and qualified immunity, when facing challenges under this Act. This strips government entities and officials of legal defenses they normally rely on when sued in court.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Women+8Good For Young Adults+7Good For Rural Residents+6Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Middle Aged+5Good For Middle Class Households+5Good For Students+5
- Healthcare
- Improves Abortion Access+8Improves Healthcare Access+7
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+6Increases Federal Power+6Improves Interstate Commerce+5Increase States Rights-6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality+7
- 6/8/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 35 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts