Bill · S. 455· Senate(119-S-455)
Protecting Sensitive Locations Act
- Introduced
- 2/6/2025
- Last activity
- 2/6/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Richard Blumenthal
- Cosponsors
- - 32 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Protecting Sensitive Locations Act limits immigration enforcement actions within 1,000 feet of designated sensitive locations. These actions are generally prohibited unless exigent circumstances exist or a rare, premeditated arrest of a high-threat individual is approved in writing. The bill requires officers to act discreetly and mandates annual training for supervising officials. It also establishes strict reporting requirements to the Department of Homeland Security and Congress. Additionally, it provides legal remedies for individuals if enforcement actions violate these rules.
Yes· 3 of 27
Would immigrants be better off under this?+9
Provides significant protection and legal recourse against enforcement at essential service locations.
Would children be better off under this?+8
Protects schools, playgrounds, and childcare facilities from enforcement actions.
Would students be better off under this?+8
Protects schools, universities, and school buses from enforcement actions.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Access to Essential Services: By prohibiting enforcement actions within 1,000 feet of sensitive locations—including schools, healthcare facilities, and places of worship—the bill ensures individuals can access these services without fear. (Section 2(a)(2))
-
Protection of Vulnerable Groups: The bill specifically protects locations that assist victims of crime, pregnant women, children, and individuals with disabilities. (Section 2(a)(9)(F)(viii))
-
Legal Recourse for Violations: If an enforcement action violates these rules, the subject of the proceeding can file a motion to terminate the removal proceeding, and information from that action cannot be used as evidence. (Section 2(a)(4))
-
Greater Accountability: The Secretary of Homeland Security must report enforcement actions at sensitive locations to the Office of the Inspector General and the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties. (Section 2(a)(6))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Security Risks in Rare Cases: While the bill limits enforcement, it allows for premeditated arrests of terrorist suspects or those posing an extraordinary danger to public safety, which may still involve high-risk operations in public areas. (Section 2(a)(3)(D))
-
Potential for Delayed Action: Officers must cease enforcement and consult supervisors in real-time if they are uncertain if exigent circumstances exist, which could potentially delay urgent responses. (Section 2(a)(2)(C))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+9Good For Children+8Good For Students+8Good For Hispanic Americans+7Good For Low Income Households+7Good For People With Disabilities+7Good For Women+6Good For Union Workers+5Good For Young Adults+5Good For Middle Aged+4Good For Retirees+4Good For Rural Residents+4Good For Seniors+4Good For Urban Residents+4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Religious Freedom+7Improves Voting Access+7Improves Disability Rights+6Improves Freedom Of Speech+5Reduces Homelessness+4
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+8Improves Mental Health Access+7Improves Opioid Crisis Response+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+8Improves Government Transparency+6Improves Freedom Of Speech+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+6
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Union Protections+5
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/13/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/6/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 21 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts