Bill · S. 364· Senate(119-S-364)
Hearing Protection Act
- Introduced
- 2/3/2025
- Last activity
- 2/3/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- Sponsored by
- Mike Crapo
- Cosponsors
- - 39 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Hearing Protection Act" aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove silencers from the legal definition of firearms. It changes how silencers are treated regarding registration and licensing requirements. The bill establishes new marking requirements for licensed importers and manufacturers of silencers. It also preempts certain state laws that tax or require registration of silencers. Additionally, the bill mandates the destruction of existing silencer registration and transfer records held by the Attorney General. Finally, it imposes a 10 percent tax on firearm silencers or mufflers.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would gun owners be better off under this?+8
The bill is highly positive for gun owners by removing federal registration and licensing requirements for silencers.
Does this protect the right to own guns?+7
The bill expands Second Amendment practical application by removing federal registration and licensing requirements for silencers.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+4
The bill improves privacy by mandating the destruction of silencer registration and transfer records.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns?-5
The bill reduces gun control measures by removing silencers from the legal definition of firearms and destroying existing records.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-4
The bill reduces state rights by preempting state laws regarding the taxation or registration of silencers.
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-3
The bill reduces domestic surveillance by requiring the destruction of existing silencer registration and transfer records.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Removal of State Restrictions: Under Section 4, the bill would prevent states or political subdivisions from imposing certain taxes, marking, recordkeeping, or registration requirements on firearm silencers.
-
Destruction of Existing Records: According to Section 5, the Attorney General would be required to destroy existing silencer registrations, transfer applications, and maker applications within 356 days of the Act's enactment.
-
Simplified Licensing Requirements: Section 3 specifies that individuals acquiring or possessing a firearm silencer in accordance with chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, would meet registration and licensing requirements of the National Firearms Act.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
New Federal Tax: Section 7 adds "Firearm silencers or firearm mufflers" to the list of articles taxable at 10 percent under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
-
New Marking Requirements: Under Section 6, licensed importers and manufacturers are required to identify silencers or mufflers with a serial number engraved or cast on the outer tube or primary structure, unless a variance is granted by the Attorney General.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Gun Owners+8Good For Business Owners+3
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Domestic Surveillance-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+4Increase States Rights-4Increases Federal Power-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Second Amendment Protections+7Improves Gun Control Measures-5
- 9/17/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/3/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 28 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Joni ErnstRepublican · Iowa
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Josh HawleyRepublican · Missouri
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
Ron JohnsonRepublican · Wisconsin
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana