Bill · S. 2761· Senate(119-S-2761)
RESULTS Act
- Introduced
- 9/10/2025
- Last activity
- 9/10/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- Sponsored by
- Thomas Tillis
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 6
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The RESULTS Act aims to provide long-term stability for Medicare beneficiaries' access to clinical diagnostic laboratory tests. It proposes to amend the Social Security Act to improve the accuracy and feasibility of collecting data on private payor-based fee schedules. The bill directs the Secretary to contract with a qualifying independent non-profit entity to access a comprehensive claims database. This data will help establish more accurate payment rates for laboratory tests. Additionally, the bill establishes a default payment system if data is unavailable. These changes are designed to modernize the way Medicare payment rates are determined for diagnostic tests.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+3
The bill aims to ensure stable access to diagnostic laboratory tests for Medicare beneficiaries, who are predominantly seniors.
Would retired people be better off under this?+3
The bill provides long-term stability for access to essential diagnostic laboratory services for Medicare beneficiaries.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+3
The bill seeks to provide long-term stability for Medicare beneficiary access to clinical diagnostic laboratory tests.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Access to Tests: The bill seeks to "provide long-term stability for Medicare beneficiary access to clinical diagnostic laboratory tests" by improving the accuracy of payment rates (Section 2).
-
More Accurate Payment Rates: By requiring the Secretary to use a "qualifying comprehensive claims database" from an "independent national nonprofit entity," the bill aims to improve the accuracy of the private payor-based fee schedule (Section 2(a)(1)(A)(ii)).
-
Protection Against Payment Gaps: For "widely available non-ADLT clinical diagnostic laboratory tests," the bill provides a default payment that is "equal to the amount of payment... for the previous year, increased by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index" if data is unavailable (Section 2(b)(2)(A)).
-
Increased Transparency: The Secretary is required to "make available to the public an explanation of the payment rate for such test," which includes supporting data so laboratories can check the accuracy of the math (Section 2(b)(4)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential for Unreliable Data Application: The bill relies on the Secretary entering into a contract with a "qualifying independent claims data entity" to report information; if the Secretary is unable to enter such a contract, a default payment process is triggered instead (Section 2(b)(2)(A)(ii)).
-
Limited Scope for Certain Tests: The specific data collection and default payment improvements apply to "widely available non-ADLT clinical diagnostic laboratory tests," which are defined as tests where the number of providers exceeds 100 (Section 2(a)(2)(E)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+3Good For Seniors+3Good For Low Income Households+2
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+3Increases Medicare Funding+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+2
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/10/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
John CornynRepublican · Texas
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont