RepublicanBill · H.Res. 818· House(119-HRES-818)

Impeaching Deborah Boardman, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Rep. Roy
Age: 54 years
Texas
Introduced
10/17/2025
Last activity
10/17/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsored by
Chip Roy
Cosponsors
Republican - 17Democrat - 0
Law
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution seeks to impeach Deborah Boardman, a Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The resolution alleges that she committed high crimes and misdemeanors by violating the constitutional standard of "good behavior." Specifically, it charges her with using her judicial position to interfere with the President's constitutional prerogatives and the enforcement of the rule of law. The impeachment focuses on her sentencing of Nicholas John Roske, who attempted to assassinate a Supreme Court Justice. The text claims her sentencing decision was based on political ideology rather than the law. Ultimately, the resolution calls for her removal from office.

Yes

  • Does this give the federal government more power?+3

    The impeachment seeks to uphold federal judicial standards and the enforcement of federal law.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2

    The resolution seeks accountability for a federal judge's sentencing decisions.

  • Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+2

    The resolution argues that the judge's decision undermined the impartiality required for due process.

The opposite· 3 of 4

  • Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?-5

    The resolution specifically challenges a judge's recognition of a defendant's transgender identity.

  • Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?-5

    The bill alleges the judge improperly prioritized gender identity over legal sentencing standards.

  • Would women be better off under this?-2

    The bill critiques a judge for a decision based on gender identity recognition.