Bill · H.R. 976· House(119-HR-976)
1071 Repeal to Protect Small Business Lending Act
- Introduced
- 2/4/2025
- Last activity
- 5/6/2025 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 65.
- Sponsored by
- Roger Williams
- Cosponsors
- - 52 - 0
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the 1071 Repeal to Protect Small Business Lending Act, aims to repeal small business loan data collection requirements. Specifically, it seeks to repeal Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. These requirements were originally added by section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The legislation includes various conforming amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+5
The bill repeals data collection requirements to reduce regulatory barriers for small businesses.
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The bill seeks to increase credit access and reduce compliance costs for small business owners.
Is this likely to create jobs?+2
The bill aims to increase access to credit for small businesses which can support job creation.
The opposite· 3 of 6
Would Black Americans be better off under this?-3
The removal of required loan data collection may hinder efforts to ensure equitable lending for Black Americans.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?-3
Reducing data collection may limit visibility into credit access disparities for Hispanic communities.
Would Asian Americans be better off under this?-3
The loss of data collection requirements may impact tracking of lending equity for Asian Americans.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased access to credit for small businesses: The bill finds that repealing the data collection requirements will reduce regulatory barriers and support greater access to credit for small businesses (Section 2).
-
Reduced costs for financial institutions: The bill finds that the current requirements have resulted in increased compliance costs for financial institutions (Section s 2).
-
Relief for smaller financial institutions: The bill finds that the regulatory burdens created by these requirements disproportionately impact smaller financial institutions, such as community banks and credit unions (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+5Increases Job Creation+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For White Americans+2Good For African Americans-3Good For Asian Americans-3Good For Hispanic Americans-3Good For Native Americans-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Reduces Lobbying-1
- 5/6/2025
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-91.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 65.
- 4/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/2/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 22.
- 4/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/6/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 2/4/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 29 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mark AlfordRepublican · Missouri
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
John CarterRepublican · Texas
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Mike EzellRepublican · Mississippi
Scott FitzgeraldRepublican · Wisconsin
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Sam GravesRepublican · Missouri
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Dusty JohnsonRepublican · South Dakota
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Trent KellyRepublican · Mississippi
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Frank LucasRepublican · Oklahoma
Barry LoudermilkRepublican · Georgia
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin
Rudy YakymRepublican · Indiana