RepublicanBill · H.R. 747· House(119-HR-747)

Stop Chinese Fentanyl Act of 2025

Rep. Barr
Age: 53 years
Kentucky
Introduced
1/28/2025
Last activity
9/3/2025 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Sponsored by
Andy Barr
Cosponsors
Republican - 7Democrat - 2
International Affairs
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. In Senate committee

What this bill would do

The Stop Chinese Fentanyl Act of 2025 aims to impose sanctions on Chinese producers of synthetic opioids and their precursors. It seeks to hold Chinese officials accountable for the spread of illicit fentanyl. The bill expands the definition of a "foreign opioid trafficker" to include certain Chinese entities and senior government officials. It also adjusts the identification of these traffickers and extends certain timeframes within the Fentanyl Sanctions Act. Additionally, the Act modifies the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to require periodic evaluations and more detailed regulatory considerations by the President.

Yes

  • Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?+7

    The bill targets the production and trafficking of fentanyl to combat the opioid crisis.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5

    The bill requires periodic annual written evaluations to be transmitted to congressional committees.

  • Does this give the federal government more power?+3

    The bill expands the President's authority to define and sanction foreign opioid traffickers.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.

What Congress actually voted on

One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.

  • The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to passPassed 407–4

    The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not.

    09/02/2025 · Roll call 220 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended”