Bill · H.R. 5512· House(119-HR-5512)
No Shari’a Act
- Introduced
- 9/19/2025
- Last activity
- 9/19/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Randy Fine
- Cosponsors
- - 33 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "No Shari'a Act" seeks to prohibit the application of Shari'a or any foreign law in United States courts if it violates constitutional rights. It defines foreign law to include religious law used as a substitute for domestic law. The bill aims to ensure that American courts rely solely on Federal and State law to provide certainty and clarity. It specifically addresses judicial decisions, contract provisions, and family law matters. The Act also mandates that the Attorney General issue regulations and judicial education to ensure uniform application. This legislation takes effect 180 days after being enacted.
Yes· 3 of 9
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+4
The bill ensures that judicial decisions and arbitration are subject to U.S. constitutional standards of due process.
Does this give the federal government more power?+3
The bill empowers the Attorney General to issue regulations and judicial education to ensure uniform application of the law.
Would children be better off under this?+3
The bill seeks to protect children from unequal treatment in family law matters involving foreign law.
The opposite
Would immigrants be better off under this?-2
The bill's restriction on foreign law may impact immigrants who rely on non-U.S. legal customs for family or contract matters.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Constitutional Rights: The bill prohibits courts from enforcing judgments or arbitration decisions that rely on Shari'a or foreign law when those laws violate constitutional rights (Section 5(a)). This is intended to safeguard fundamental liberties such as due process, equal protection, and freedom of speech (Section 4(3)).
-
Safeguarding Vulnerable Populations: The Act expresses a concern for protecting women, children, and vulnerable populations who might face unequal treatment or coercion under foreign legal systems (Section 2(3)).
-
Clarity in Family Law: In matters of marriage, divorce, child custody, adoption, or inheritance, the bill prevents the application of foreign law if it is inconsistent with fundamental rights or public policy (Section 5(c)).
-
Legal Certainty: The Act intends to provide certainty and clarity in how constitutional protections are applied across the nation (Section 3(b)(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Limitations on Contract Provisions: While a contract provision choosing foreign law can be valid, it will not be enforceable if it results in a violation of constitutional rights (Section 5(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+4Increases Federal Power+3Improves Freedom Of Speech+2Improves Government Transparency+1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+3Good For Women+3Good For Immigrants-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality+3Improves Racial Equity+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+2
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/8/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 9/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/19/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Rick AllenRepublican · Georgia
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Kevin HernRepublican · Oklahoma
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
Scott PerryRepublican · Pennsylvania
Jimmy PatronisRepublican · Florida
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin