Bill · H.R. 32· House(119-HR-32)
No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act
- Introduced
- 1/3/2025
- Last activity
- 1/3/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Nick LaLota
- Cosponsors
- - 21 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the ``No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act'', targets sanctuary jurisdictions. It defines a sanctuary jurisdiction as any State or political subdivision that restricts the exchange of citizenship or immigration status information or refuses to comply with specific Department of Homeland Security detainer requests. Under this Act, such jurisdictions would lose eligibility for Federal funds intended to benefit aliens without lawful status. These benefits include food, shelter, healthcare, legal services, and transportation. The Secretary of Homeland Security is required to submit an annual report listing jurisdictions that failed to comply with specific requests.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+5
The bill uses federal funding eligibility to compel state and local jurisdictions to comply with federal immigration enforcement requests.
Does this tighten control of the border?+4
The bill incentivizes cooperation with Department of Homeland Security detainer and information requests.
The opposite· 3 of 6
Would immigrants be better off under this?-8
The bill reduces access to food, shelter, healthcare, and legal services for undocumented immigrants in sanctuary jurisdictions.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?-7
The bill removes federal funding intended to provide healthcare services to undocumented immigrants in sanctuary jurisdictions.
Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?-6
The bill eliminates federal funding for food and shelter intended for undocumented immigrants in certain jurisdictions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Federal Fund Accountability: By making sanctuary jurisdictions ineligible for certain funds, the bill aims to prevent the use of Federal money for the benefit of aliens who are in the United States without lawful status (Section 3).
-
Information Sharing: The bill seeks to ensure that government entities can send, receive, maintain, or exchange information regarding an individual's citizenship or immigration status (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Law Enforcement Cooperation: The bill encourages compliance with requests made by the Department of Homeland Security regarding detainers or notifications about the release of an individual (Section 2(a)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Essential Services: Sanctuary jurisdictions would lose Federal funds intended for the provision of food, shelter, healthcare services, legal services, and transportation for aliens present without lawful status (Section 3).
-
Criminal Justice Exceptions: While the bill defines sanctuary jurisdictions, it notes that a jurisdiction is not considered such if its officials refuse to comply with detainer requests specifically for individuals who come forward as a victim or a witness to a criminal offense (Section 2(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants-8Good For Low Income Households-5
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access-7
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+4Improves Poverty Reduction-6Improves Pathway To Citizenship-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+5
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-3
- 8/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/9/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/3/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Stephanie BiceRepublican · Oklahoma
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Erin HouchinRepublican · Indiana
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Barry LoudermilkRepublican · Georgia
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Ryan MackenzieRepublican · Pennsylvania
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Daniel WebsterRepublican · Florida