Bill · H.R. 2978· House(119-HR-2978)
GUARD Act
- Introduced
- 4/21/2025
- Last activity
- 9/16/2026 — Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 627.
- Sponsored by
- Zachary Nunn
- Cosponsors
- - 30 - 24
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Awaiting Senate
- On Senate calendar
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Guarding Unprotected Aging Retirees from Deception Act of 2026 or the GUARD Act of 2026. It allows State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies that receive certain Federal grant funds to use that money to investigate elder financial fraud, pig butchering, and general financial fraud. The legislation also clarifies that Federal law enforcement agencies can assist these local agencies with blockchain tracing tools and related technology. Additionally, the bill requires various reports to be submitted to Congress regarding fraud statistics, scam trends, and recovery efforts. Finally, it outlines definitions for financial crimes, scams, and eligible grant funds to guide law enforcement efforts.
Yes· 3 of 21
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+9
The bill specifically prioritizes the investigation of elder financial fraud to protect seniors.
Would retired people be better off under this?+9
Directly aims to protect retirees from deception and financial fraud.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+7
The bill specifically targets the investigation of financial fraud, scams, and pig butchering to protect consumers.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to passPassed 414–7
The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not.
09/15/2026 · Roll call 301 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 3(a): This section lets law enforcement agencies use specific Federal grant funds to hire personnel, obtain software, and train experts to investigate elder financial fraud, pig butchering, and general financial fraud. This could benefit individuals by providing better local protection and resources to fight complex financial scams that target everyday people.
-
Section 3(a)(2)(B): This part allows grant funds to be used for training specifically focused on assisting victims of financial fraud and exploitation. This is positive because it directly supports victims who have suffered financial losses.
-
Section 7: This provision clarifies that Federal law enforcement agencies may assist State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies and fusion centers in using tracing tools for blockchain and related technology. This could help catch scammers who use cryptocurrency and digital assets to hide stolen money.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 3(b): This section requires law enforcement agencies and grantees that use these Federal funds for fraud investigations to submit a report to the Federal agency that provided the grant within one year. While meant for accountability, the administrative paperwork and reporting burden could potentially pull law enforcement officers away from active investigations to write reports.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+9Good For Seniors+9Good For People With Disabilities+6Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Billionaires+3Good For High Income Households+3Good For High Net Worth Individuals+3Good For Middle Aged+3Good For Native Americans+3Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals+3Good For Young Adults+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+7Increases Job Creation+3Improves Economic Growth+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Increase States Rights+2Increases Federal Power+2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense+6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+4Improves Poverty Reduction+2
- 9/16/2026
- Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 627.
- 9/15/2026
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 414 - 7 (Roll no. 301). (text: CR H5602-5603)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 414 - 7 (Roll no. 301). (text: CR H5602-5603)
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5822)
- 9/14/2026
- At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2978.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5602-5605)
- Ms. De La Cruz moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-709, Part I.
- 6/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/19/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/13/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 52 - 0.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/22/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/23/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/18/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/9/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2025
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Scott FitzgeraldRepublican · Wisconsin
Julie FedorchakRepublican · North Dakota
Brett GuthrieRepublican · Kentucky
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Young KimRepublican · California
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Thomas TiffanyRepublican · Wisconsin
Derek TranDemocrat · California
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Robert WittmanRepublican · Virginia
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California