Bill · H.R. 2709· House(119-HR-2709)
Save Our Sequoias Act
- Introduced
- 4/8/2025
- Last activity
- 9/16/2026 — Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearings held.
- Sponsored by
- Vince Fong
- Cosponsors
- - 15 - 13
- Introduced
- Passed House
- In Senate committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the Save Our Sequoias Act, aims to improve the health and resiliency of giant sequoias through coordinated federal, state, and tribal management. It establishes a shared stewardship agreement, codifies the Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition, and mandates health assessments and a tracking dashboard. The legislation declares a 7-year emergency response period allowing certain forest management projects to protect the trees from wildfires, insects, and drought. It also creates strike teams, restoration grants, insect monitoring programs, and expanded stewardship contracting. Finally, the bill sets up an emergency protection program and fund supported by philanthropic gifts.
Yes· 3 of 11
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+8
The bill establishes measures to protect giant sequoia groves from wildfire, insects, and drought.
Would Native Americans be better off under this?+8
The bill provides specific support for Tribal management, conservation, and historic preservation.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+7
The bill implements shared stewardship and specific protection projects for public lands.
The opposite
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-3
The bill allows for categorical exclusions from environmental impact statements, reducing standard oversight.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Small Businesses and Local Jobs: Section 9 of the bill prioritizes awarding grants to small businesses and tribal entities, particularly in rural areas, to help create or support jobs while managing hazardous fuels.
-
Tribal Involvement and Funding: Section 3 requires the Secretary to enter into shared stewardship agreements with the Tule River Indian Tribe, and Section 12 mandates that at least 15 percent of the funds in the Giant Sequoia Emergency Protection Fund be used to support tribal management and conservation.
-
Public Access to Information: Section 5 requires the Coalition to maintain a public website and searchable dashboard detailing sequoia resiliency, proposed protection projects, and environmental review statuses, keeping folks informed about government actions.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Exemption from Environmental Laws: Section 5 and Section 6 state that developing the health assessment and carrying out specific protection projects and reforestation activities covering up to 2,000 or 3,000 acres are exempt from the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. This means normal environmental review processes will be skipped for these projects.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+8Improves Public Land Management+7Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+5Improves Rural Development+4
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Native Americans+8Good For Business Owners+5Good For Rural Residents+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+6Increases Job Creation+5
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+3Improves Due Process-3
- 9/16/2026
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearings held.
- 3/17/2026
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 3/16/2026
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2503-2507)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2503-2507)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2709.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2503-2509)
- Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- 3/12/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-542, Part I.
- Committee on Agriculture discharged.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 466.
- 3/5/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
- 9/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/18/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.
- 4/8/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 27 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Cliff BentzRepublican · Oregon
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Jared GoldenDemocrat · Maine
Adam GrayDemocrat · California
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Darrell IssaRepublican · California
Young KimRepublican · California
Kevin KileyIndependent · California
Doug LaMalfaRepublican · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Tom McClintockRepublican · California
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
John RutherfordRepublican · Florida
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Daniel WebsterRepublican · Florida
Bruce WestermanRepublican · Arkansas