Tom McClintock
Republican · Representative for California's 5th district
25 sponsored · 73 cosponsored
In the House since 2009
Age 70
Contact their office: (202) 225-2511 · 2256 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 · Official website
In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)
- Sponsored 25 bills.The typical House member sponsored 25. Bills they wrote, not ones they signed on to.
- None of the bills they wrote or backed has become law yet.Most bills never get a vote, from any member.
- 17 passed the House and wait on the Senate.The Senate has to pass the same text before it can become law.
- Missed 22 of 676 recorded votes (3.3%).The typical House member missed 1.9%. The record doesn’t say why.
- Works most on immigration and government operations and politics.18 and 14 of the 98 bills they wrote or backed.
What they got done
Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.
Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (17)
Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.
This bill revokes a specific public land order from 1964 and transfers certain Federal land in California into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians.
A Senate committee approved it and sent it to the floor · 119-HR-2302
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?The Act transfers federal land into trust for the specific benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians. +7
- Their billTo provide for the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over certain Federal land in the State of California, and for other purposes.Sep 14, 2026
This bill deals with the transfer of certain federal land in Tuolumne County, California. It moves roughly 160 acres of National Forest System land so it can be managed as part of Yosemite National Park.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-8454
- Yes: Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?The bill optimizes administrative jurisdiction by transferring land to the agency best suited for its management. +5
This bill aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act. It targets aliens who participated in, planned, financed, or supported attacks against Israel initiated by Hamas starting October 7, 2023.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-176
- Yes: Does this tighten control of the border?The bill strengthens border control by making specific individuals inadmissible to the United States. +5
- No: Would immigrants be better off under this?The bill denies immigration relief and imposes inadmissibility on a specific group of people. -8
And 14 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.
Still waiting, of the 25 bills they wrote: 1 cleared committee and waits for a first vote, 20 are in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.
What their bills would do
Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().
Who their bills would affect
What else they would change
How they voted lately
Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The main purpose is to provide a clear definition of adequate consideration for certain closely held stock.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would retired people be better off under this?Improving the clarity of stock valuation for ESOPs supports more stable retirement transitions. +4
119-S-2403 · roll call 314
This Act provides for improvements to rivers and harbors in the United States and the conservation and development of water and related resources.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?Directly authorizes land transfers to Tribal entities and prioritizes technical assistance for Tribal communities. +8
- No: Does this reduce what the federal government spends?The bill explicitly increases spending limits and funding authorizations for dozens of regional water resource programs. -5
119-HR-9497 · roll call 313
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
119-HR-9340 · roll call 312
On the President’s vetoes
The President can refuse to sign a bill both chambers passed. It becomes law anyway only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to pass it again. A vote against the veto (a Yea) was a vote to make the bill law over the President’s objection; a vote for it (a Nay) was a vote to let the veto stand.
Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 248–177; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 236–188; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
How busy they have been
How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.