Bill · H.R. 2555· House(119-HR-2555)
Freedom of Association in Higher Education Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 4/1/2025
- Last activity
- 8/27/2026 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 682.
- Sponsored by
- Erin Houchin
- Cosponsors
- - 35 - 11
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Freedom of Association in Higher Education Act of 2026," seeks to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965. It aims to protect students and single-sex social organizations from adverse actions by institutions of higher education. The legislation focuses on preventing institutions from penalizing students based on their membership in organizations that limit membership to one sex. It also seeks to ensure that these organizations are treated without bias compared to other social organizations. Finally, it establishes protections for the rights of students to freely associate with these groups.
Yes· 3 of 10
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+8
Specifically protects college-aged students' right to join and lead social organizations without fear of retaliation.
Would students be better off under this?+8
Provides broad protections against adverse institutional actions for students participating in single-sex social organizations.
Would women be better off under this?+5
Protects the right of female students to form and participate in single-sex social organizations.
The opposite
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?-5
The bill's biological definition of sex and protection of single-sex groups may exclude or limit LGBTQ inclusive policies.
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?-5
The bill defines sex biologically as male or female and protects single-sex organizations based on this definition.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection for Student Association: Students will be able to form, join, or lead single-sex social organizations, even if the institution does not officially recognize them (Section 3(a)(1)).
-
Prevention of Discrimination and Retaliation: Institutions that receive federal funds are prohibited from taking adverse actions against students or organizations based on their membership practices of limiting membership to one sex (Section 3(b)(2)).
-
Protection Against Coercion: Schools cannot require or coerce a student to waive their freedom of association as a condition of enrolling in the institution (Section 3(b)(1)).
-
Equal Treatment of Organizations: The bill seeks to ensure that single-sex social organizations are treated by institutions without bias compared to other social organizations (Section 2(a)(2)(B)).
-
Protection of Student Opportunities: By prohibiting "adverse actions," the bill prevents institutions from withholding financial assistance, scholarships, on-campus employment, or access to housing based on a student's membership in a single-sex organization (Section 3(d)(1)(C-D)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
No Obligation for Recognition: The bill does not require an institution of higher education to officially recognize a single-sex social organization (Section 3(c)(1)).
-
Continued Disciplinary Authority: Institutions still maintain the right to take adverse action against a student for academic or nonacademic misconduct, regardless of their organization membership (Section 3(c)(2)(A)).
-
Religious Mission Exceptions: Private institutions may still take adverse action against a student if the institution determines the organization's purpose is incompatible with its religious mission (Section 3(c)(2)(C)).
-
Limits on Lawful Organization Protection: The protections do not apply if the stated purpose of the organization is to incite or produce imminent lawless action (Section 3(c)(2)(B)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Students+8Good For Young Adults+8Good For Men+5Good For Women+5Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For L G B T Q Community-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+5Improves Privacy Rights+5Increases Federal Power+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Religious Freedom+5Improves L G B T Q Rights-5
- 8/27/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-781.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 682.
- 8/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/20/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/16/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/15/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/17/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/1/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Stephanie BiceRepublican · Oklahoma
Tim BurchettRepublican · Tennessee
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Virginia FoxxRepublican · North Carolina
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Richard HudsonRepublican · North Carolina
J. HillRepublican · Arkansas
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Dusty JohnsonRepublican · South Dakota
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Nick LaLotaRepublican · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Mike RogersRepublican · Alabama
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Austin ScottRepublican · Georgia
Elise StefanikRepublican · New York
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Robert WittmanRepublican · Virginia
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia