Mike Rogers
Republican · Representative for Alabama's 3rd district
12 sponsored · 136 cosponsored
In the House since 2003
Age 68
Contact their office: (202) 225-3261 · 2469 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 · Official website
In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)
- Sponsored 12 bills.The typical House member sponsored 25. Bills they wrote, not ones they signed on to.
- 1 bill they backed became law.They cosponsored it.
- 17 passed the House and wait on the Senate.And 1 has passed both chambers and gone to the President.
- Missed 21 of 676 recorded votes (3.1%).The typical House member missed 1.9%. The record doesn’t say why.
- Works most on crime and law enforcement and health.23 and 19 of the 148 bills they wrote or backed.
What they got done
Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.
Became law (1)
This Act authorizes the award of 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. The medals recognize the team's victory over the Soviet Union during the 1980 Winter Olympics.
Became law · 119-HR-452
Passed Congress — the President's turn (1)
Both chambers passed it. The President signs it into law or vetoes it, and a veto stands unless two-thirds of each chamber vote to pass it anyway. Everything Congress has sent the President →
- Their billDirecting the Secretary of the Senate to make a correction in the enrollment of the bill S. 1071.Dec 17, 2025
This concurrent resolution directs the Secretary of the Senate to make a specific correction to the enrollment of bill S. 1071. The purpose of the correction is to amend the long title of the bill.
Agreed to by the Senate with no one objecting, no names recorded · 119-HCONRES-66
Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (17)
Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.
The bill authorizes appropriations for fiscal year 2027 for military activities of the Department of Defense, military construction, and defense activities of the Department of Energy.
Passed the House 216–212 · 119-HR-8800
- Yes: Does this put more money into scientific research?Massive investment in quantum computing, AI, hypersonics, biotechnology, and nuclear research. +9
- No: Does this reduce what is spent on the military?Substantially increases spending across all DoD branches for procurement, R&D, and nuclear modernization. -10
- Their billStreamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026Sep 10, 2025
This Act authorizes various appropriations for the Department of Defense, military construction, and Department of Energy national security activities.
Passed the House 231–196 · 119-HR-3838
- Yes: Does this put more money into scientific research?The bill allocates significant funding across numerous sectors including AI, biotechnology, and advanced manufacturing. +7
- No: Does this reduce what is spent on the military?The bill authorizes significant new spending for various military programs and construction projects. -5
- They cosponsoredTo designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office".Sep 16, 2026
This bill names a specific United States Postal Service facility after the Tuskegee Airmen. The building is located at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-6006
- Yes: Would Black Americans be better off under this?The bill honors the legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen, who were African American military pilots. +3
And 14 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.
Still waiting, of the 12 bills they wrote: 9 are in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.
What their bills would do
Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().
Who their bills would affect
What else they would change
How they voted lately
Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The main purpose is to provide a clear definition of adequate consideration for certain closely held stock.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would retired people be better off under this?Improving the clarity of stock valuation for ESOPs supports more stable retirement transitions. +4
119-S-2403 · roll call 314
This Act provides for improvements to rivers and harbors in the United States and the conservation and development of water and related resources.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?Directly authorizes land transfers to Tribal entities and prioritizes technical assistance for Tribal communities. +8
- No: Does this reduce what the federal government spends?The bill explicitly increases spending limits and funding authorizations for dozens of regional water resource programs. -5
119-HR-9497 · roll call 313
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
119-HR-9340 · roll call 312
On the President’s vetoes
The President can refuse to sign a bill both chambers passed. It becomes law anyway only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to pass it again. A vote against the veto (a Yea) was a vote to make the bill law over the President’s objection; a vote for it (a Nay) was a vote to let the veto stand.
Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 248–177; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 236–188; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
How busy they have been
How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.