Bill · H.R. 116· House(119-HR-116)
Stopping Border Surges Act
- Introduced
- 1/3/2025
- Last activity
- 1/3/2025 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Andy Biggs
- Cosponsors
- - 39 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Stopping Border Surges Act aims to close loopholes in immigration laws regarding unaccompanied alien children and the asylum process. Title I modifies the repatriation rules for unaccompanied children, sets new standards for family detention, and updates special immigrant juvenile status. Title II enacts major asylum reforms, including stricter credible fear interview standards, new safe third country rules, and penalties for asylum fraud. The bill also changes application timing, the burden of proof, and employment eligibility timeframes for asylum seekers. Finally, it grants broader authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security over asylum determinations.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+5
The bill expands federal discretion in the detention and removal of minors and asylum applicants.
Does this tighten control of the border?+5
The bill implements stricter asylum rules, higher standards for credible fear, and increased penalties to secure the border.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3
The bill mandates audio/visual recordings of interviews to improve the accuracy of the record.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Would immigrants be better off under this?-8
The bill implements stricter detention rules, reduced asylum timelines, and increased penalties for asylum seekers.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-6
The bill shortens asylum application windows and introduces stricter standards that may impact due process.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-5
The bill preempts state licensing requirements for immigration detention facilities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 101 requires that unaccompanied alien children be interviewed by an immigration officer who has specialized training in interviewing child trafficking victims, which could better protect vulnerable kids.
-
Section 203 improves accountability and record-keeping by mandating audio or audiovisual recordings of expedited removal and credible fear interviews, and ensures that competent interpreters are used who are not affiliated with the alien's home country government.
-
Section 204 protects victims of severe forms of trafficking by exempting them from the rule that denies asylum eligibility to individuals who transited through another country before reaching the United States.
-
Section 206 explicitly protects individuals by ensuring that a finding of a frivolous asylum application does not prevent them from seeking withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) or protection under the Convention Against Torture.
-
Section 213 aims to deter and punish fraud by establishing criminal fines and up to 10 years in prison for anyone who knowingly makes materially false statements or uses fraudulent documents in an asylum or withholding of removal matter.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 101 cuts the timeframe down and requires unaccompanied children who do not meet certain criteria to have a hearing before an immigration judge within just 14 days of being screened, which could put a heavy burden on children trying to navigate legal proceedings quickly.
-
Section 102 removes state licensing requirements for family or child immigration detention facilities, preventing state and local governments from overseeing the safety and standards of these facilities.
-
Section 204 denies asylum eligibility to individuals who travel through another country on their way to the United States unless they applied for and were denied protection in that transit country or meet strict trafficking exceptions, which could bar many legitimate asylum seekers.
-
Section 209 shortens the window to apply for asylum from 1 year to 6 months from the date of arrival in the United States, making it much harder for traumatized individuals to meet the deadline.
-
Section 212 extends the wait time to receive employment authorization from 180 days to 1 year for asylum applicants, and limits the authorization expiration to 6 months, which could prevent individuals from legally supporting themselves and their families while their cases are pending.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants-8Good For Children-4
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+5Improves Government Transparency+3Improves Due Process-6Increase States Rights-5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+5Improves Pathway To Citizenship-5
- 9/16/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/24/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/22/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/19/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/3/2025
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Scott DesJarlaisRepublican · Tennessee
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Tom McClintockRepublican · California
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Riley MooreRepublican · West Virginia
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Scott PerryRepublican · Pennsylvania
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Dale StrongRepublican · Alabama
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas