Bill · H.R. 1109· House(119-HR-1109)
Litigation Transparency Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 2/7/2025
- Last activity
- 11/19/2025 — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Sponsored by
- Darrell Issa
- Cosponsors
- - 30 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Litigation Transparency Act of 2025. It requires people involved in civil lawsuits or their lawyers to share who has a right to get paid based on how the lawsuit turns out. They must tell the court and the other parties in writing and share the actual agreements. There are specific exceptions for things like regular loan repayments with limits on interest or getting attorney's fees reimbursed. These disclosures must be made within ten days of the agreement being made or when the action is filed, and they must be corrected if they become wrong. The rules apply to any civil action pending on or started after the date the act is enacted.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+4
The bill mandates the disclosure of third-party identities and agreements to the court and other parties, increasing transparency in the judicial process.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+3
The bill increases transparency regarding third-party beneficiaries in civil actions, which may prevent undisclosed interests from influencing litigation outcomes.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+2
The requirement for disclosure and production of agreements ensures all parties have access to relevant information regarding contingent rights.
The opposite
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?-3
The bill requires the disclosure of identities and private agreements regarding contingent payments, which reduces privacy for third-party beneficiaries.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Transparency in Legal Actions: Section 2(a) requires parties and their lawyers to disclose the identity of anyone who has a right to receive a payment contingent on the outcome of a civil action. This could be considered positive because it lets everyone involved in a lawsuit know who might be profiting from the case behind the scenes.
-
Access to Underlying Agreements: Section 2(a) also requires the production of any agreement creating that contingent right for inspection and copying. This might be seen as a positive step to keep things out in the open and hold our legal system accountable.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Burden of Disclosure Requirements: Section 2(a) and Section 2(c) require parties or counsel to write down disclosures and produce agreements within ten days or at the time of filing. This could be a burden for individuals managing a lawsuit who have to deal with extra paperwork and administrative rules.
-
Ongoing Duty to Correct: Section 2(d) places a duty on a party or counsel to timely supplement or correct disclosures if they become incomplete or incorrect. This might be viewed as a negative constant chore for people who are already stressed dealing with court proceedings.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Improves Due Process+2Improves Privacy Rights-3
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- 11/18/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/29/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/21/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/5/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/7/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Eric CrawfordRepublican · Arkansas
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Chuck EdwardsRepublican · North Carolina
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Scott FitzgeraldRepublican · Wisconsin
Scott FranklinRepublican · Florida
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
J. HillRepublican · Arkansas
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Daniel WebsterRepublican · Florida