The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee27 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, Agriculture, Education and Workforce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Sep 17
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Jun 25
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The main purpose of the bill is to extend the time period for the contribution of military death benefits.
Yes· 2 of 11
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+5Provides greater flexibility for survivors of military personnel to utilize death benefits.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+5Directly benefits the families and survivors of deceased military personnel.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Agriculture · Jun 18
H. Res. 1376 is a resolution to support the contributions and goals of Lavender Growers Month. It recognizes that lavender is a specialty crop used in manufacturing, culinary arts, wellness, and agriculture.
Yes· 2 of 10
Would farmers be better off under this?+5Provides official recognition and promotes the goals of lavender growers.
Would business owners be better off under this?+4Positively promotes and encourages public support for lavender business owners.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · May 26
This bill aims to establish programs that improve bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure while incentivizing bicycle use in transit.
Yes· 2 of 17
Would children be better off under this?+5The bill funds on-bicycle safety education for elementary and secondary school students.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+5The bill funds infrastructure to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · May 19
This bill aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to impose a 100 percent tax on specified settlement fund payments.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6The bill mandates public disclosure of returns related to specified settlement fund payments, enhancing governmental transparency.
The opposite· 2 of 4
Would billionaires be better off under this?-5The legislation imposes a heavy 100 percent tax on settlement payments received by specific high-profile individuals and their affiliates.
Would high-income households be better off under this?-5The bill targets specific high-value settlement funds received by former presidents and associated persons with a 100 percent tax.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · May 15
This resolution expresses support for designating May 17, 2026, as "Necrotizing Enterocolitis Awareness Day."
Yes· 2 of 6
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+2The bill highlights the disproportionate impact of NEC on Black infants to drive awareness and care improvements.
Would children be better off under this?+2The resolution focuses on improving outcomes for infants at risk of necrotizing enterocolitis.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Mar 27
This resolution expresses support for the goals and ideals of National Women's History Month. It provides a historical overview of women's suffrage and various milestones in women's roles in the United States.
Yes· 2 of 6
Would women be better off under this?+5The resolution is dedicated to recognizing and honoring the historical achievements and suffrage movement of women.
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?+3The resolution honors the history of the women's suffrage movement and the fight for equal rights.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Mar 4
This bill seeks to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965.
Yes· 2 of 11
Would students be better off under this?+9Students benefit directly through significantly reduced interest rates on current and future loans.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+8Young adults seeking higher education will benefit significantly from much lower interest rates.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-3The reduction in interest income for the government effectively increases the cost of the student loan program.
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?-3The bill reduces the interest revenue the government receives from its loan portfolio.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Feb 20
This bill seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code to create an individual tariff refund credit.
Yes· 2 of 9
Does this raise the taxes companies pay?+7The bill imposes a 100 percent excise tax on certain large corporate tariff refunds.
Does this cut taxes for middle-income families?+5The bill provides a tax credit for eligible individuals based on household size to refund tariff revenues.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-4Large business owners may face a 100 percent excise tax on certain tariff refunds.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-3The bill requires the government to pay out significant tariff refunds to individuals and U.s. possessions.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Feb 4
This bill aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It imposes a 100 percent tax on qualified civil action amounts received by certain individuals.
Yes
Does this raise taxes on the highest earners?+10The bill imposes a 100 percent tax on civil action damages received by former Presidents and their families.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5The bill targets potential profiteering by the President during their time in office.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Would high-income households be better off under this?-10The tax specifically targets high-earning former Presidents and their families through a 100 percent tax on certain damages.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-10The bill imposes a heavy tax on individuals in high-profile, high-wealth positions receiving legal damages.
