The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee42 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Oct 9
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Oct 1
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Foreign Affairs · Sep 24
This bill changes the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 by removing the restriction known as the Helms amendment, which previously blocked United States foreign assistance funding from being used for safe abortion services.
Yes· 2 of 3
Would women be better off under this?+6The legislation removes restrictions on foreign assistance, allowing funds to be used for safe abortion and reproductive health services that benefit women globally.
Does this improve care during pregnancy, childbirth and after birth?+5The bill aims to reduce maternal deaths by authorizing foreign assistance for safe abortion services and related training/equipment.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Sep 16
The bill introduces new requirements and preferences for companies seeking federal contracts and Department of Defense contracts.
Yes· 2 of 30
Would union members be better off under this?+7Union neutrality agreements and strike replacement bans significantly strengthen labor organizing rights.
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?+7Contractors are required to sign neutrality agreements regarding labor organization and agree not to hire replacement workers during strikes.
The opposite· 2 of 4
Would billionaires be better off under this?-3Requirements limiting excessive executive pay ratios and tax compliance rules reduce favorable financial conditions for top earners.
Would business owners be better off under this?-3Strict contracting prerequisites and restrictions on private equity and stock buybacks impose heavy operational burdens.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jul 30
This bill aims to amend the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Yes· 2 of 4
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+7The bill greatly enhances consumer protection by expanding the FTC's authority to seek restitution, refunds, and disgorgement of unjust enrichment.
Does this give the federal government more power?+5The bill increases federal power by expanding the scope of relief the FTC can seek in court.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-5The expanded authority for the FTC to seek various forms of relief creates greater regulatory and financial risk for businesses.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-2The imposition of a 10-year limitation period on equitable relief may restrict the ability to seek justice for older violations.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Financial Services · Jul 23
This bill requires newly constructed, federally assisted single-family houses, town houses, and certain ground-floor units to meet minimum visitability standards for persons with disabilities.
Yes· 2 of 7
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+9The bill provides strong legal recourse and mandatory accessibility standards for individuals with disabilities in federally assisted housing.
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?+8The bill mandates specific visitability standards for federally assisted housing to ensure accessibility for persons with disabilities.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Financial Services, and Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jul 23
This bill establishes the American Manufacturing Renaissance Act to create a national manufacturing strategy and monitor supply chain weaknesses.
Yes· 2 of 44
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?+10Explicitly sets a national strategic objective for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions sector-wide by 2030.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+9Directly targets economically distressed areas and provides wraparound services like food and health assistance.
The opposite· 2 of 4
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-5Increases federal spending by creating a new Corporation and funding grants.
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?-4Authorizes $12 billion in new spending over three fiscal years.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · Jun 9
This bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. It lists specific chemicals, such as PFAS and asbestos, that are deemed unsafe for use as food contact substances.
Yes· 2 of 31
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+9Specifically identifies the elderly as a vulnerable population to be protected.
Would children be better off under this?+9Specifically targets protections for infants, children, and adolescents from toxic chemicals.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-3May increase compliance costs for packaging manufacturers and food companies.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · May 21
This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the reduction of traffic fatalities. The House commits to advancing policies intended to end roadway fatalities by the year 2050.
Yes· 2 of 8
Would children be better off under this?+3The resolution aims to reduce traffic fatalities which are a leading cause of death for young people.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+3The resolution targets the reduction of crashes which disproportionately affect younger demographics.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · May 19
This bill directs the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to establish a Perinatal Care Alternative Payment Model Demonstration Project.
Yes· 2 of 10
Would women be better off under this?+8The bill is specifically designed to improve maternal health outcomes, address mental health, and support diverse maternity care teams.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+7The bill aims to improve maternal health outcomes and access through diverse care teams and nonhospital birth settings.
