Bill · H.R. 10459· House(119-HR-10459)
Patriotic Corporations of America Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 9/16/2026
- Last activity
- 9/16/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Janice Schakowsky
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The bill, known as the "Patriotic Corporations of America Act of 2026," introduces new requirements and preferences for companies seeking federal contracts and Department of Defense contracts. It sets strict labor, environmental, tax, and market standards that businesses must meet to qualify for government contracts. Companies must pay minimum wages tied to specific indexes, offer paid leave, and agree to neutrality regarding labor unions. Additionally, the legislation places restrictions on private equity firms and creates contract preferences for businesses that meet certain pro-worker and pro-environment practices.
Yes· 3 of 28
Would union members be better off under this?+7
Union neutrality agreements and strike replacement bans significantly strengthen labor organizing rights.
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?+7
Contractors are required to sign neutrality agreements regarding labor organization and agree not to hire replacement workers during strikes.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+6
The wage floor of $15 or higher directly boosts low-income workers on federal projects.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
Strict contracting prerequisites and restrictions on private equity and stock buybacks impose heavy operational burdens.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-3
Limitations on dividends, executive pay ratios, and stock buybacks restrict wealth extraction and corporate maneuvers.
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?-3
Restrictions on private equity fee-charging and corporate consolidation limit financial structuring options.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 4715(a)(1) and Section 3310(a)(1): These sections require contractors to pay employees a wage of at least $15 (adjusted annually) or a wage based on the Fair Labor Standards Act plus 10 percent. This is positive because it ensures workers on federal and defense contracts receive a higher baseline income.
-
Section 4715(a)(4) and Section 3310(a)(4): These provisions require employers to provide at least 7 days of paid sick leave, 7 days of paid family and medical leave, and 7 days of paid vacation per year. This benefits workers by granting them paid time off to care for their health and families without losing income.
-
Section 4715(a)(6) and Section 3310(a)(6): Contractors are required to submit actionable plans for natural disasters and health crises, including provisions for essential worker pay, quarantine pay, whistleblower protections, and protective equipment. This is a positive outcome for workers' safety and security during emergencies.
-
Section 4715(a)(8) and Section 3310(a)(8): For contracts valued over $100,000,000, offerors must submit a plan to meet the child care needs of their workforce. This helps working parents access necessary child care support.
-
Section 4716(a)(3) and Section 3311(a)(3): The bill provides contract preferences for offerors that have at least one seat on their Board of Directors for a representative elected by the employees. This gives workers a direct voice in company leadership.
-
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 4715(c) and Section 3310(c): The bill prohibits executive agencies from awarding contracts to offerors that do not maintain headquarters in the United States or whose Federal income tax liability does not exceed their tax credits. While intended to target tax avoidance, this could disqualify certain businesses and disrupt supply chains for government projects.
-
Section 4715(d) and Section 3310(d): These sections place heavy restrictions on private equity firms, including banning them from charging management and monitoring fees to the offeror and restricting dividend payments. This could make it difficult for private equity-backed companies to bid on federal work, potentially limiting competition for government contracts.
-
Section 4715(e) and Section 3310(e): Offerors must agree not to acquire a competitor or rival for one to two years following the close of a federal contract if it lessens competition. This restriction may burden businesses by limiting their growth and corporate restructuring strategies.
-
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+7Good For Low Income Households+6Good For African Americans+4Good For Asian Americans+4Good For Children+4Good For Hispanic Americans+4Good For L G B T Q Community+4Good For Middle Aged+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Native Americans+4Good For People With Disabilities+4Good For Veterans+4Good For Women+4Good For Young Adults+4Good For Seniors+3Good For Students+3Good For Billionaires-3Good For Business Owners-3Good For High Net Worth Individuals-3Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Childcare Affordability+5Improves Disability Rights+4Improves Gender Equality+4Improves Poverty Reduction+4Improves Racial Equity+4
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Union Protections+7Increases Minimum Wage+6Improves Consumer Protection+3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense+3
- 9/16/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas