The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee26 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · Oct 1
This resolution recognizes how important pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is for preventing HIV.
Yes· 2 of 9
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+4The resolution encourages public health agencies, providers, and stakeholders to reduce barriers and increase access to PrEP and related services.
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?+3Promoting PrEP awareness and reducing barriers directly benefits the LGBTQ community, which experiences higher risks of HIV transmission.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, the Judiciary, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Sep 24
This legislation aims to hold private investment funds responsible for the financial debts, legal penalties, and labor violations of the companies they buy and control.
Yes· 2 of 13
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8Title V requires private funds to publicly disclose fees, debt levels, fund performance, and political spending.
Would union members be better off under this?+8Section 209 protects striking workers, and Title III prioritizes unpaid wages, severance, and pension obligations in bankruptcy.
The opposite· 2 of 7
Would billionaires be better off under this?-8The legislation directly targets Wall Street private equity billionaires by eliminating tax loopholes and imposing strict joint and several liability.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-7Higher tax burdens and stricter transparency and fiduciary rules negatively affect private equity fund managers and wealthy investors.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jun 23
This bill aims to restructure and stabilize the Federal Pell Grant program. This bill increases the maximum award amounts, starting at $10,000 for the 2026-2027 award year and rising to $15,000 for subsequent years.
Yes· 2 of 11
Would students be better off under this?+9The bill increases maximum grant amounts, extends eligibility semesters, and reduces academic progress penalties.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+9The bill increases Pell Grant amounts and provides special considerations for those receiving means-tested benefits.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Apr 28
This resolution expresses support for designating April as Undiagnosed Awareness Month and April 29th as Undiagnosed Day.
Yes· 2 of 7
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+5The resolution supports efforts to improve diagnostic precision and care for those living with undiagnosed medical conditions.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+5The resolution supports the Undiagnosed Diseases Network which aims to expand access to diagnostic tools and clinical research for those with rare diseases.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Mar 4
This bill seeks to rename the program currently known as Medicare Advantage.
Yes· 2 of 3
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+2The bill protects consumers by preventing private entities from using the 'Medicare' name to market their plans via civil penalties.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+1The bill establishes a transition process to help seniors avoid confusion when the Medicare Advantage program is renamed.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-2Private health plan entities face new civil money penalties for using the term 'Medicare' in their plan titles.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · Feb 25
This resolution supports the designation of February 28 as "HIV is Not a Crime Awareness Day." It aims to affirm that people living with HIV should not be criminalized based on their status.
Yes· 2 of 11
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+8The bill supports increased funding for HIV treatment, prevention, and care transitions.
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+7The bill addresses the disproportionate impact of HIV criminalization on Black communities.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Feb 12
This bill aims to ensure the Department of Defense achieves a clean audit opinion on its financial statements.
Yes· 2 of 6
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6The bill forces financial accountability by requiring an unqualified audit opinion for Department of Defense elements.
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?+5The bill directs funds from Department of Defense budget reductions to the General Fund of the Treasury for deficit reduction.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jan 21
This bill seeks to amend the Social Security Act to allow Medicare Part B to cover certain HIV prevention services provided by pharmacists.
Yes· 2 of 6
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+7The bill provides new Medicare benefits that directly benefit seniors through improved HIV prevention access.
Would retired people be better off under this?+7The bill expands Medicare coverage, which directly benefits retirees seeking HIV prevention services.
