John James
Republican · Representative for Michigan's 10th district
28 sponsored · 129 cosponsored
In the House since 2023
Age 45
Contact their office: (202) 225-4961 · 1519 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 · Official website
In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)
- Sponsored 28 bills.The typical House member sponsored 25. Bills they wrote, not ones they signed on to.
- 3 bills they backed became law.1 they wrote, 2 they cosponsored.
- 12 passed the House and wait on the Senate.The Senate has to pass the same text before it can become law.
- Missed 67 of 676 recorded votes (9.9%).The typical House member missed 1.9%. The record doesn’t say why.
- Works most on health and armed forces and national security.23 bills each, of the 157 they wrote or backed.
What they got done
Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.
Became law (3)
This is a Joint Resolution from the 119th Congress. It seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Became law · 119-HJRES-87
- Yes: Would business owners be better off under this?The resolution may reduce compliance costs for businesses involved in heavy-duty vehicle manufacturing and operation. +3
- No: Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?By nullifying the EPA rule, the resolution weakens specific state-level environmental protections for vehicle emissions. -5
This joint resolution states that Congress disapproves of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Became law · 119-HJRES-89
- Yes: Does this leave more decisions to the states?The resolution supports state-level control by nullifying federal oversight of the EPA rule. +3
- No: Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?Disapproving the EPA rule weakens existing environmental standards for motor vehicle pollution. -4
This joint resolution expresses congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Became law · 119-HJRES-88
- Yes: Does this leave more decisions to the states?By striking the EPA rule, Congress supports the ability of states like California to set their own stricter standards without federal interference. +5
- No: Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?Stripping the EPA rule reduces the regulatory pressure to transition to cleaner vehicle standards, potentially slowing carbon emission reductions. -5
Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (12)
Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.
This bill seeks to amend the Department of Energy Organization Act. It aims to secure the supply of critical energy resources, such as minerals and other materials, that are essential to the United States energy sector.
Passed the House 223–206 · 119-HR-3617
- Yes: Is this likely to create jobs?The emphasis on increasing domestic production and processing of critical minerals may lead to job growth in those sectors. +3
This bill creates a program within the Department of Commerce to protect critical supply chains and emerging technologies.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-2444
- Yes: Is this likely to create jobs?The bill specifically identifies opportunities to create high-quality manufacturing jobs. +5
- They cosponsoredTo designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 117 West Lovett Street in Charlotte, Michigan, as the "Francis C. Flaherty Post Office Building".Sep 16, 2026
This bill names a specific United States Postal Service facility after an individual. The building is located at 117 West Lovett Street in Charlotte, Michigan.
Passed the House by voice vote, no names recorded · 119-HR-9570
And 9 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.
Still waiting, of the 28 bills they wrote: 25 are in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.
What their bills would do
Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().
Who their bills would affect
What else they would change
How they voted lately
Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The main purpose is to provide a clear definition of adequate consideration for certain closely held stock.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would retired people be better off under this?Improving the clarity of stock valuation for ESOPs supports more stable retirement transitions. +4
119-S-2403 · roll call 314
This Act provides for improvements to rivers and harbors in the United States and the conservation and development of water and related resources.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Would Native Americans be better off under this?Directly authorizes land transfers to Tribal entities and prioritizes technical assistance for Tribal communities. +8
- No: Does this reduce what the federal government spends?The bill explicitly increases spending limits and funding authorizations for dozens of regional water resource programs. -5
119-HR-9497 · roll call 313
This bill amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to create a new Federal standard regarding the costs of upgrades for large-load customers.
A fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass — Passed
- Yes: Does this keep data centers from raising household electric and water bills?The bill requires large-load customers to cover the full incremental cost of grid upgrades and provide financial assurances, preventing those costs from being passed to households. +7
- No: Would business owners be better off under this?Large-scale non-residential energy consumers face increased costs and financial assurance requirements. -5
119-HR-9340 · roll call 312
On the President’s vetoes
The President can refuse to sign a bill both chambers passed. It becomes law anyway only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to pass it again. A vote against the veto (a Yea) was a vote to make the bill law over the President’s objection; a vote for it (a Nay) was a vote to let the veto stand.
Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 248–177; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act — vetoed Dec 29, 2025
For the vetovoted Nay, to let the veto stand.
The override fell short in the House, 236–188; it needed two-thirds · Jan 8, 2026
How busy they have been
How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.