The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
▶In committee16 billsIntroduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Aug 3
This bill aims to eliminate asset limits used by various federally funded, means-tested public assistance programs.
Yes· 2 of 6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+8The removal of asset limits allows low-income families to save and access assistance more easily.
Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?+7Eliminating asset limits for TANF, SNAP, and LIHEAP helps low-income families build savings and reduces their dependence on public assistance.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Mar 3
This resolution is an inquiry that requests information from the President and directs the Secretaries of the Treasury and Homeland Security to provide documents to the House of Representatives.
Yes· 2 of 3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5The resolution seeks to increase transparency regarding the exchange of taxpayer information between federal agencies.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+4The oversight mechanism is designed to protect taxpayer privacy by monitoring potential unauthorized disclosures.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Jan 13
This resolution supports the goals and ideals of Korean American Day. It recognizes the arrival of the first wave of 102 Korean immigrants on January 13, 1903.
Yes· 2 of 6
Would Asian Americans be better off under this?+5The resolution specifically honors the history and contributions of the Korean American community.
Would immigrants be better off under this?+3The resolution recognizes the historical journey and contributions of Korean immigrants to the United States.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jan 12
This bill aims to restrict how Federal money is used regarding Greenland. It prohibits the use of Federal funds to support an invasion, annexation, or purchase of Greenland by the United States or its officials.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Does this send more money or help to other countries?-3The bill prevents increasing United States funding or assistance for Greenland beyond current levels.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-2The bill limits the ability of the federal government to increase financial investment or assistance in Greenland.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Border Security and Enforcement · Dec 4
This bill aims to reduce specific immigration enforcement funds while creating new tax credits to increase housing access.
Yes· 2 of 11
Does this make housing cost less?+9The bill creates multiple tax credits for homebuyers, renters, starter homes, and building conversions to expand housing access.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+7The bill increases LIHTC credits for extremely low-income households and provides a significant renter tax credit.
The opposite
Does this tighten control of the border?-8The bill rescinds tens of billions of dollars meant for border infrastructure, technology, and personnel.
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?-4The bill rescinds $1 billion from Department of Defense border support missions.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Sep 16
This bill aims to set aside specific funds for Indian populations.
Yes· 2 of 6
Would Native Americans be better off under this?+8The bill mandates a 15 percent fund set-aside and a guarantee of at least 10 grants specifically for Indian tribes and organizations.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+7The bill reserves 15 percent of health profession opportunity grant funds specifically for Indian tribes, organizations, and Tribal Colleges to support healthcare careers.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Agriculture · Jul 29
This bill aims to amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008. The primary goal is to remove certain eligibility disqualifications for students.
Yes· 2 of 6
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+5The bill specifically targets students in institutions of higher education, a demographic typically comprised of young adults.
Is this likely to lower what families pay for groceries?+5The bill increases access to the SNAP program for students, which helps households purchase food.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jul 25
This bill aims to stop the use of specific unmanned aircraft vehicles for surveillance of people in the United States who are participating in protests or civil disobedience.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+7The bill mandates annual reports to Congress detailing unauthorized or novel uses of covered drones, including details on surveillance of U.S. persons.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+7The bill enhances privacy by prohibiting the surveillance of individuals participating in protests or civil disobedience via high-altitude drones.
The opposite
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-5The bill acts to decrease domestic surveillance capabilities of military-developed unmanned aircraft vehicles.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-2The bill restricts the use of funds for specific drone surveillance activities, which may slightly reduce the budget for those specific operations.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jul 23
This bill aims to stop the President from imposing certain duties on baby clothing items. It specifically prohibits the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to tax these goods.
Yes· 2 of 7
Is this likely to lower the prices of everyday things people buy?+3The bill lowers the cost of baby clothing and accessories by prohibiting and terminating specific import duties.
Does this cut taxes for middle-income families?+3The bill reduces costs for families by terminating duties on various baby clothing items.
The opposite
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-2The bill limits the President's unilateral authority to impose duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1The bill reduces federal revenue by prohibiting and terminating the collection of duties on baby clothing.
