Bill · S.Res. 787· Senate(119-SRES-787)
A resolution celebrating the historic anniversary of the June 24, 2022, decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
- Introduced
- 6/24/2026
- Last activity
- 6/24/2026 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3214)
- Sponsored by
- Steve Daines
- Cosponsors
- - 17 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution commemorates the four-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. It characterizes the Dobbs ruling as a correction of the injustice found in Roe v. Wade. The text asserts that the authority to regulate abortion should belong to the people and their elected representatives. It also highlights the role of pregnancy centers in supporting women and families. Finally, the resolution expresses a commitment to protecting unborn life and supporting families.
Yes
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+8
The resolution advocates for returning the authority to regulate abortion to the states and their elected representatives.
Would children be better off under this?+5
The resolution emphasizes the protection of unborn life and support for children in families.
Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?+1
The resolution commits to supporting families and pregnancy centers that assist women in need.
The opposite
Does this make abortion easier to get?-10
The resolution celebrates the Supreme Court decision that removes federal constitutional protections for abortion access.
Would women be better off under this?-5
The resolution supports a legal framework that restricts reproductive autonomy and emphasizes the role of pregnancy centers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Unborn Life: The resolution celebrates the ruling in Dobbs as a means to save millions of lives and expresses a commitment to guarding unborn lives against lethal violence (Resolution clauses 2 and 3).
-
Support for Families: The resolution commits to supporting families, which includes new and expectant mothers and their children (Resolution clause 4).
-
Community Resources: The text notes that more than 2,700 pregnancy centers exist to help meet the physical, psychological, emotional, and spiritual needs of women and families (Whereas clause 7).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Impact of State Regulation: The resolution states that the Dobbs decision returned the authority to regulate abortion to the people and their elected representatives, which allows for the enactment and enforcement of laws protecting unborn life (Whereas clause 5 and Resolution clause 5).
-
Opposition to Federal Policy: The text identifies the Biden Administration's mail-order abortion drug policy as something that undermines the ability of States to enforce laws intended to protect unborn life (Whereas clause 6).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Improves Abortion Access-10
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+8
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+5Good For Women-5
- 7/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3214)
- 15 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Josh HawleyRepublican · Missouri
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi