Bill · S.Res. 100· Senate(119-SRES-100)
A resolution dissenting from the United States delegation's February 24, 2025, vote at the United Nations General Assembly.
- Introduced
- 2/26/2025
- Last activity
- 2/26/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1401-1402)
- Sponsored by
- Jeanne Shaheen
- Cosponsors
- - 25 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses dissent regarding a February 24, 2025, vote by the United States delegation at the United Nations General Assembly. The vote was against a United Nations draft resolution titled "Advancing a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine." The resolution states that this vote aligned the United States with the Russian Federation, Belarus, and North Korea. It notes that this vote marks a departure from a decade of bipartisan policy and previous alignment with democratic states. Consequently, the Senate resolves to condemn the vote and decry the refusal to identify Russia as an aggressor. Finally, it urges the United States to work closer with Ukraine and European allies on future efforts.
Yes
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+8
The resolution urges the United States to work more closely with Ukraine and European allies on future United Nations efforts.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+1
The resolution's focus on national security and international stability indirectly supports the long-term security environment for veterans.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+1
Strengthening international alliances and stability is generally conducive to the national security interests that protect veterans.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reaffirming Support for Ukraine: The resolution reaffirms support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders (Section 5). This could be seen as positive for those who believe in maintaining international borders and supporting Ukraine's independence.
-
Encouraging Cooperation with Allies: The Senate urges the United States to work closely with Ukraine and European allies on future efforts at the United Nations (Section 4). This could be considered positive for those who believe United States cooperation with allies advances national security interests.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Condemning Current Diplomatic Actions: The resolution condemns the February 24, 2025, United States vote against Ukraine's resolution at the United Nations General Assembly (Section 1). This could be seen as negative for those who support the specific vote cast by the United States delegation.
-
Decrying Delegation Refusals: The resolution decries the refusal of the United States delegation to identify the Russian Federation as an aggressor or call for a complete military withdrawal (Section 2). This could be viewed as negative by those who believe the current delegation's approach is appropriate.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+8Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+1
- 3/4/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 3/3/2025
- 24 Cosponsors added.
- 2/26/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1401-1402)
- Introduced in Senate
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts