Bill · S. 889· Senate(119-S-889)
Extreme Risk Protection Order Expansion Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 3/6/2025
- Last activity
- 3/6/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Richard Blumenthal
- Cosponsors
- - 17 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Extreme Risk Protection Order Expansion Act of 2025 establishes a grant program to support State, Tribal, and local efforts to remove firearms from individuals deemed a danger to themselves or others. This occurs through court-ordered extreme risk protection orders. The bill requires States or Tribes to pass specific legislation to become eligible for these grants. Funds can be used for law enforcement training, court capacity, and public awareness. Additionally, the bill amends federal law to prohibit firearm possession for those subject to these specific court orders.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns?+7
The bill creates a grant program to facilitate the removal of firearms from individuals deemed a danger to themselves or others via court orders.
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?+2
The bill includes training to address bias related to disability in the administration of protection orders.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+2
The bill provides training to connect individuals with social services including housing assistance.
The opposite
Would gun owners be better off under this?-6
The bill establishes new federal prohibitions on firearm possession for individuals subject to specific court orders.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-3
The bill allows for ex parte orders which can remove firearms from an individual before they have a chance to be heard in court.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased safety through firearm removal: The bill allows for the removal of firearms from individuals identified as a danger of causing harm to themselves or others via extreme risk protection orders (Section 2(a)(2)).
-
Targeted training for law enforcement: Grants can be used to train law enforcement officers in the safe, impartial, and equitable use of these orders, including de-escalation and crisis intervention (Section 2(b)(4)(A)).
-
Support for vulnerable populations: Training includes addressing bias related to race, ethnicity, gender, mental health, and disability to ensure more equitable administration of orders (Section 2(b)(4)(A)(i)).
-
Resource connections: The bill supports training that helps refer individuals to social services, including mental health, substance abuse, and housing assistance (Section 2(b)(4)(A)(iv)).
-
Interstate enforcement of safety orders: Through "full faith and credit," an order issued in one State or Tribe must be recognized and enforced by another State or Tribe (Section 6(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on firearm possession: Individuals subject to a court order that finds they pose a danger to themselves or others are prohibited from possessing or receiving firearms under federal law (Section 3).
-
Immediate loss of firearms via ex parte orders: A court may issue an "ex parte" order—meaning without a prior hearing—if there is probable cause to believe an individual poses a danger (Section 2(c)(1)(D)).
-
Potential for loss of property: While the bill states firearms cannot be disposed of or destroyed without consent during the order period, the order itself requires the removal or surrender of firearms (Section s 2(c)(1)(E)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gun Control Measures+7Improves Disability Rights+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process-3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+2Good For People With Disabilities+2Good For Gun Owners-6
- Healthcare
- Improves Mental Health Access+2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility+1
- 3/6/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 17 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts