Bill · S. 624· Senate(119-S-624)
Equal COLA Act
- Introduced
- 2/18/2025
- Last activity
- 2/18/2025 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
- Sponsored by
- Alex Padilla
- Cosponsors
- - 18 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Equal COLA Act," seeks to amend title 5 of the United States Code. The primary goal is to achieve parity between cost-of-living adjustments for annuities under the Federal Employees Retirement System and those under the Civil Service Retirement System. It changes how annuity increases are calculated based on percent change in the price index. These changes would apply to cost-of-living adjustments made after the Act is enacted. The amendment covers annuities regardless of whether they commenced before, on, or after the date of enactment.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+5
The bill increases the cost-of-living adjustments for federal retirement annuities, providing more income for retirees.
Would retired people be better off under this?+5
The bill provides higher annual cost-of-living adjustments for federal retirees under the FERS system.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+3
Federal employees and retirees in the middle class will benefit from more predictable and parity-aligned income adjustments.
The opposite
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?-2
By increasing the cost-of-living adjustment for FERS annuities to match CSRS, the bill increases future federal outlays.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Annuity Adjustments: The bill changes the language of section 8462(b)(1) of title 5 to adjust annuities by the percent change in the price index of the base quarter of the current year over the preceding year. This is intended to achieve parity between FERS and CSRS annuities (Section 2(a)).
-
Broad Application of Benefits: The new adjustment rules apply to any annuity covered by section 8462 of title 5, whether the annuity started before, on, or after the bill becomes law (Section 2(b)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+5Good For Seniors+5Good For Middle Class Households+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility-2
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/18/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts