Bill · S. 4944· Senate(119-S-4944)
American Energy and Mineral Infrastructure Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 6/24/2026
- Last activity
- 6/24/2026 — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Alan Armstrong
- Cosponsors
- - 20 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The American Energy and Mineral Infrastructure Act of 2026 aims to streamline the permitting processes for natural gas pipelines, water quality certifications, and environmental reviews. It designates the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the sole lead agency for natural gas pipeline environmental reviews and sets strict timelines for interagency coordination. The legislation alters the judicial review process by limiting the ability of courts to vacate or stop projects and restricting who can file lawsuits. It also extends general permit terms under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act from five years to ten years. Additionally, the bill introduces provisions for hardrock mining mill sites and establishes the Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund. Finally, it defines the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as a purely procedural statute that does not mandate specific environmental outcomes.
Yes· 3 of 17
Would business owners be better off under this?+7
Drastically reduces permitting timelines and regulatory hurdles for energy/mining firms.
Would billionaires be better off under this?+6
Directly benefits owners of large energy and mining corporations.
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?+5
Favors large-scale infrastructure developers and energy moguls.
The opposite· 3 of 12
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-7
The bill explicitly declares NEPA as purely procedural and limits the scope of environmental reviews.
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?-6
The act facilitates the expansion of natural gas and mineral extraction.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?-6
Reduces state authority over water quality certifications under the Clean Water Act.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Establishment of the Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund: Section 6(b) establishes the Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund using amounts collected from claim maintenance fees on mill sites. This fund can be used to carry out necessary mine reclamation work under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which helps address environmental hazards.
-
Streamlined Public Tracking and Transparency: Section 2(i) requires the Commission to track and make available to the public on its website information related to Federal authorizations, schedules, and expected completion dates. This provision increases accountability and helps the public stay informed about the status of energy infrastructure projects.
-
Support for Tribal Trust Resources: Section 7(b) creates a presumption that the effects of taking no action will be negative for federally recognized Indian Tribes when proposed agency actions affect Tribal trust resources initiated by those Tribes. This provision helps protect Tribal interests by acknowledging potential harms of inaction.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Judicial Remedies: Sections 2(j), 3(h), and 5(c) limit the authority of courts to set aside, vacate, or enjoin permits, orders, or certifications found to be non-compliant with federal law. Instead, courts are generally required to remand the matter back to the agency without stopping the project, which may reduce legal recourse for individuals or groups affected by harmful environmental impacts.
-
Exclusion of Certain Water Quality Certifications: Section 2(f) states that a certification under section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act shall not be required with respect to a Federal authorization for natural gas pipelines. This change could reduce state oversight and protections regarding local water quality impacts from pipeline discharges.
-
Stricter Standing Requirements for Lawsuits: Sections 3(h), 5(c), and 7(h) impose strict limitations on who can challenge permits and environmental reviews in court, requiring parties to prove direct and irreparable economic harm or that they submitted detailed comments during the public process. These hurdles may prevent everyday citizens and public interest organizations from holding officials accountable through legal action.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+7Good For Billionaires+6Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals+5Good For High Net Worth Individuals+4Good For Native Americans+4Good For Union Workers+3Good For High Income Households+2Good For Rural Residents+2Good For Children-3Good For African Americans-2Good For Hispanic Americans-2Good For Low Income Households-2Good For Urban Residents-2Good For Young Adults-2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+3Reduces Gas Prices+3Improves Public Land Management+2Improves Environmental Protections-7Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-6Reduces Carbon Emissions-5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+4Increases Job Creation+3Reduces Inflation+1Improves Consumer Protection-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+5Improves Government Transparency+4Improves Interstate Commerce+4Improves Due Process-6Increase States Rights-6
- 9/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/7/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/6/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/5/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/28/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Lisa MurkowskiRepublican · Alaska
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Ashley MoodyRepublican · Florida
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi